Abstract
AbstractThis study aimed to ascertain the appropriate test methods for the investigation of the effect of personal protective equipment on mobility of firefighters. Nine male volunteers performed a physical performance test (crawl, obstacle course, side-to-side jumps, heavy-object drag, and step-ups), functional balance test (functional reach, timed up and go, and wooden plank time), range of motion test, and subjective evaluation under four clothing conditions with different weights and combinations of personal protective equipment. The results showed that physical performance, functional balance ability, and joint angles significantly declined with increased weight of personal protective equipment. On subjective evaluation, wearing heavy personal protective equipment increased perceived exertion and discomfort on movement. Our results proved that some of our test methods, including the obstacle course, side-to-side jumps, functional reach, timed up and go, range of motion test, and subjective evaluation, can be used to examine the mobility of personal protective equipment wearers. The findings of this study provide an effective guide for researchers and firefighters regarding the evaluation of mobility with personal protective equipment, as well as for manufacturers in the development of enhanced, comfortable personal protective equipment.
Funder
Fire and Disaster Management Agency (FDMA) in Japan
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Marketing,Strategy and Management,Materials Science (miscellaneous),Cultural Studies,Social Psychology
Reference26 articles.
1. Ciesielska-Wróbel, I., DenHartog, E., & Barker, R. (2017). Measuring the effects of structural turnout suits on firefighter range of motion and comfort. Ergonomics, 60(7), 997–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1229044
2. BS 8469. (2007). Personal Protective Equipment for Firefighters. Assessment of ergonomic performance and compatibility. In: Requirements and test methods. British Standard Institute.
3. Coca, A., Kim, J. H., Duffy, R., & Williams, W. J. (2011). Field evaluation of a new prototype self-contained breathing apparatus. Ergonomics, 54(12), 1197–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2011.622797
4. Coca, A., Roberge, R., Shepherd, A., Powell, J. B., Stull, J. O., & Williams, W. J. (2008). Ergonomic comparison of a chem/bio prototype firefighter ensemble and a standard ensemble. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 104(2), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-007-0644-z
5. Coca, A., Williams, W. J., Roberge, R. J., & Powell, J. B. (2010). Effects of fire fighter protective ensembles on mobility and performance. Applied Ergonomics, 41(4), 636–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.01.001
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献