Abstract
Abstract
Background
The timed up and down stairs (TUDS) test is widely used to assess the time required by a patient to climb up and down stairs as a measure of functional mobility.
Aim
This cross-sectional study was conducted to examine test-retest, intra-rater, and inter-rater reliability of TUDS test in children with cerebral palsy (CP).
Subjects
Forty children (22 boys and 18 girls) with unilateral and bilateral spastic CP were selected from the Cairo University Hospitals to participate in this study. The age range was 3–9 years. Subjects classified according to Gross Motor Function Classification System-Expanded and Revised (GMFCS-E&R) in categories 1 or 2 only were included. All subjects with muscle tone above normal (spasticity) were included.
Methods
The TUDS test was performed at two testing sessions on the same day to determine test-retest reliability; the main investigator scored all children at real time using a stopwatch and then rescored them later from video recording to determine intra-rater reliability. Another research team member scored all children from video recording to determine inter-rater reliability. Scoring was carried out at real time and from video recordings of the trials. Reliability was estimated using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC).
Results
The TUDS test showed excellent reliability for all measured types of reliability. ICC score for test-retest reliability was 0.978, ICC score for intra-rater reliability was 0.999, while ICC score for inter-rater reliability was 0.998 and 0.999.
Conclusion
The TUDS test is a reliable outcome measure for children with spastic CP. It can be measured at real time or later from video recording of the performance trials. The TUDS test is an important tool in the re-evaluation process of children with CP.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Medicine,Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference14 articles.
1. Sadowska M, Sarecka-Hujar B, Kopyta I. Cerebral palsy: current opinions on definition, epidemiology, risk factors, classification and treatment options. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020;16:1505–18. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S235165.
2. Khalil M, Elweshahy H, Abdelghani H, Omar T, Ahmed S. Quality of care provided to children with cerebral palsy, Alexandria, Egypt. Egypt: EMHJ. 2018;24(6):522–31.
3. Mayoclinic.org. Cerebral palsy: symptoms and causes; 2021. [Internet] https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/cerebral-palsy/symptoms-causes/syc-20353999
4. Morgan P, McGinley JL. Cerebral palsy. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;159:323–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-63916-5.00020-3.
5. Cetin SY, Erel S. Investigation of the validity and reliability of the L test in children with cerebral palsy. Physiother Theory Pract. 2020;38(1):182–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2020.1731894.