Abstract
Abstract
Background
Gaining proficiency in Bharatanatyam dance form necessitates maintenance of different postures for prolonged duration. These repetitive movements place tremendous physical demands on the body at young age and may alter the postural profile of the dancer. The study aimed to evaluate the differences in terms of posture between female Bharatanatyam dancers and age-matched non-dancers. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 40 female Bharatanatyam dancers and 40 age-matched female non-dancers in the age group of 18 to 30 years. Analysis of erect standing posture of dancers and non-dancers was conducted in a reserved environment using a photogrammetric method. Static photographs of the subjects were taken in the sagittal plane. The measurement of the angles of the digitized photographs was performed using KINOVEA 0.8.15 software. Head protrusion angle, cervical lordosis angle, thoracic kyphosis angle, lumbar lordosis angle, and pelvic tilt angle were evaluated.
Results
There was no significant difference between the dancers and non-dancers with respect to head protrusion angle (p = 0.081), cervical lordosis (p = 0.15), and thoracic kyphosis (p = 0.33). Significant differences were identified between the dancers and non-dancers for lumbar lordosis (p = 0.00) and pelvic tilt (p = 0.00) using independent t test with dancers. Higher values of lumbar lordosis and pelvic tilt were observed in dancers.
Conclusion
Increased lumbar lordosis and anterior pelvic tilt were observed in Bharatanatyam dancers as compared to non-dancers. Hence, it is vital to establish preventive measures like postural re-education, muscular balance, and flexibility to prevent erroneous postural patterns capable of causing pain and injuries.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Medicine,Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference26 articles.
1. Characteristics of the tandava dance. In: The Natya-shastra of Bharatamuni. New Delhi: Indian Books Centre; Soneji D. Revisiting Bharatanatyam. In: Bharatanatyam. Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 197–205.
2. Chatterjee A. The therapeutic value of Indian classical, folk and innovative dance forms. Rupkatha J Interdiscip Stud Humanit. 2013;5:75–83.
3. Panhale VP, Walankar PP, Sridhar A. Analysis of postural risk and pain assessment in Bharatanatyam dancers. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2020;24(2):66–71. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoem.IJOEM_190_19.
4. Stanos S, Mogilevsky M, Rader L, McLean J, Baum A. Physical medicine approaches to pain medicine. In: Smith HS, editor. Current therapy in pain. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2009. p. 527–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4160-4836-7.00073-0.
5. Kendall F, McCreary E, Provance PG, Rodgers M, Romani WA. Muscle testing and function with posture and pain. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献