Abstract
Abstract
Background
Possible COVID-19 pneumonia patients (ppCOVID-19) generally overwhelmed emergency departments (EDs) during the first COVID-19 wave. Home-confinement and primary-care phone follow-up was the first-level regional policy for preventing EDs to collapse. But when X-rays were needed, the traditional outpatient workflow at the radiology department was inefficient and potential interpersonal infections were of concern. We aimed to assess the efficiency of a primary-care high-resolution radiology service (pcHRRS) for ppCOVID-19 in terms of time at hospital and decision’s reliability.
Methods
We assessed 849 consecutive ppCOVID-19 patients, 418 through the pcHRRS (home-confined ppCOVID-19 with negative—group 1- and positive—group 2-X-rays) and 431 arriving with respiratory symptoms to the ED by themselves (group 3). The pcHRRS provided X-rays and oximetry in an only-one-patient agenda. Radiologists made next-step decisions (group 1: pneumonia negative, home-confinement follow-up; group 2: pneumonia positive, ED assessment) according to X-ray results. We used ANOVA and Bonferroni correction, Student T, Chi2 tests to analyse changes in the ED workload, time-to-decision differences between groups, potential delays in patients acceding through the ED, and pcHRRS performance for deciding admission.
Results
The pcHRRS halved ED respiratory patients (49.2%), allowed faster decisions (group 1 vs. home-discharged group 2 and group 3 patients: 0:41 ± 1:05 h; 3:36 ± 2:58 h; 3:50 ± 3:16 h; group 1 vs. all group 2 and group 3 patients: 0:41 ± 1:05 h; 5.25 ± 3.08; 5:36 ± 4:36 h; group 2 vs. group 3 admitted patients: 5:27 ± 3:08 h vs. 7:42 ± 5:02 h; all p < 0.001) and prompted admission (84/93, 90.3%) while maintaining time response for ED patients.
Conclusions
Our pcHRRS may be a more efficient entry-door for ppCOVID-19 by decreasing ED patients and making expedited decisions while guaranteeing social distance.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference21 articles.
1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (2020) Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: increased transmission in the EU/EEA and the UK—seventh update 2020. Stockholm: ECDC. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/RRA-seventh-update-Outbreak-of-coronavirus-disease-COVID-19.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2020
2. La Opinión de Murcia (2020) Los profesionales de Atención Primaria aún controlan a 12.000 sospechosos de Covid. https://www.laopiniondemurcia.es/comunidad/2020/05/24/pacientes-covid-seguimiento-caen-mitad/1116028.html. Accessed 6 July 2020
3. Rubin GD, Ryerson CJ, Haramati LB et al (2020) The role of chest imaging in patient management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multinational consensus statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 296:172–180
4. Two metres or one: what is the evidence for physical distancing in covid-19? | The BMJ. https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3223.long. Accessed 31 Aug 2020
5. The British Society of Thoracic Imaging (2020) COVID-19 BSTI reporting templates. https://www.bsti.org.uk/covid-19-resources/covid-19-bsti-reporting-templates/. Accessed 4 July 2020
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献