Abstract
Abstract
This is a condensed summary of an international multisociety statement on ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology produced by the ACR, European Society of Radiology, RSNA, Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine, European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics, Canadian Association of Radiologists, and American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
AI has great potential to increase efficiency and accuracy throughout radiology, but also carries inherent pitfalls and biases. Widespread use of AI-based intelligent and autonomous systems in radiology can increase the risk of systemic errors with high consequence, and highlights complex ethical and societal issues. Currently, there is little experience using AI for patient care in diverse clinical settings. Extensive research is needed to understand how to best deploy AI in clinical practice.
This statement highlights our consensus that ethical use of AI in radiology should promote well-being, minimize harm, and ensure that the benefits and harms are distributed among stakeholders in a just manner. We believe AI should respect human rights and freedoms, including dignity and privacy. It should be designed for maximum transparency and dependability. Ultimate responsibility and accountability for AI remains with its human designers and operators for the foreseeable future.
The radiology community should start now to develop codes of ethics and practice for AI which promote any use that helps patients and the common good and should block use of radiology data and algorithms for financial gain without those two attributes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference17 articles.
1. Kohli M, Prevedello LM, Filice RW, Geis JR (2017) Implementing machine learning in radiology practice and research. AJR Am J Roentgenol:1–7
https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.17224
2. Erickson BJ, Korfiatis P, Akkus Z, Kline TL (2017) Machine learning for medical imaging. Radiographics 37:505–515
https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160130
3. Mittelstadt BD, Floridi L (2016) The ethics of big data: current and forseeable issues in biomedical contexts. Sci Eng Ethics 22:303–341
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9652-2
4. IEEE Standards Association. IEEE Global Initiative Ethically Aligned Design, Version 2 (EADv2). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Available via:
https://standards.ieee.org/content/dam/ieeestandards/standards/web/documents/other/ead_v2.pdf
. Accessed 23 Aug 2019
5. O’Neil C (2016) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy, 1st edn. Crown, New York
Cited by
68 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献