A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study

Published:2018-02-05 Issue:1 Volume:20 Page:
ISSN:1465-542X
Container-title:Breast Cancer Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Breast Cancer Res

Author:

Astley Susan M.,Harkness Elaine F.,Sergeant Jamie C.,Warwick Jane,Stavrinos Paula,Warren Ruth,Wilson Mary,Beetles Ursula,Gadde Soujanya,Lim Yit,Jain Anil,Bundred Sara,Barr Nicola,Reece Valerie,Brentnall Adam R.,Cuzick Jack,Howell Tony,Evans D. Gareth

Funder

Programme Grants for Applied Research

Prevent Breast Cancer

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s13058-018-0932-z.pdf

Reference37 articles.

1. Day N, Warren R. Mammographic screening and mammographic patterns. Breast Cancer Res. 2000;2(4):247.

2. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. New Engl J Med. 2005;353(17):1773–83.

3. van Gils CH, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, Hendriks JH, Holland R. Effect of mammographic breast density on breast cancer screening performance: a study in Nijmegen, The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(4):267–71.

4. Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, White E. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval-and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(13):1081–7.