Abstract
Abstract
Background
Breast cancers exhibit considerable heterogeneity in their biology, immunology, and prognosis. Currently, no validated, serum protein-based tools are available to evaluate the prognosis of patients with early breast cancer.
Methods
The study population consisted of 521 early-stage breast cancer patients with a median follow-up of 8.9 years. Additionally, 61 patients with breast fibroadenoma or atypical ductal hyperplasia were included as controls. We used a proximity extension assay to measure the preoperative serum levels of 92 proteins associated with inflammatory and immune response processes. The invasive cancers were randomly split into discovery (n = 413) and validation (n = 108) cohorts for the statistical analyses.
Results
Using LASSO regression, we identified a nine-protein signature (CCL8, CCL23, CCL28, CSCL10, S100A12, IL10, IL10RB, STAMPB2, and TNFβ) that predicted various survival endpoints more accurately than traditional prognostic factors. In the time-dependent analyses, the prognostic power of the model remained rather stable over time. We also developed and validated a 17-protein model with the potential to differentiate benign breast lesions from malignant lesions (Wilcoxon p < 2.2*10− 16; AUC 0.94).
Conclusions
Inflammation and immunity-related serum proteins have the potential to rise above the classical prognostic factors of early-stage breast cancer. They may also help to distinguish benign from malignant breast lesions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference55 articles.
1. NHS Digital. Cancer Survival in England. [cited 2023 May 26]. Available from https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/cancer-survival-in-england#resources.
2. Finnish Cancer Registry. Cancer Statistics. [cited 2023 May 26]. Available from https://cancerregistry.fi/statistics/cancer-statistics/.
3. Sheffield KM, Peachey JR, Method M, Grimes BR, Brown J, Saverno K, et al. A real-world US study of recurrence risks using combined clinicopathological features in HR-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. Future Oncol. 2022;18:2667–82.
4. Cardoso F, van’t Veer LJ, Bogaerts J, Slaets L, Viale G, Delaloge S, et al. 70-Gene signature as an aid to treatment decisions in early-stage breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:717–29.
5. Kalinsky K, Barlow WE, Gralow JR, Meric-Bernstam F, Albain KS, Hayes DF, et al. 21-Gene assay to inform Chemotherapy Benefit in Node-positive breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:2336–47.