Impact of randomized blinded rechecking program on the performance of the AFB Microscopy Laboratory Network in Uganda: a decadal retrospective study
-
Published:2023-07-26
Issue:1
Volume:23
Page:
-
ISSN:1471-2334
-
Container-title:BMC Infectious Diseases
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Infect Dis
Author:
Nsawotebba Andrew,Ibanda Ivan,Mujuni Dennis,Nabadda Susan,Nadunga Diana,Kabugo Joel,Adam Isa,Wekiya Enock,Nyombi Abdunoor,Nsubuga Richard,Ademun Patrick,Musisi Kenneth,Kangave Fredrick,Joloba Moses
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Smear microscopy has remained the initial diagnostic test for presumptive tuberculosis (TB) patients in health facilities without the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended rapid diagnostic tools. In the Uganda TB laboratory network, the technique remains the only tool to monitor response to treatment among drug susceptible TB patients, with the country currently having over 1,600 microscopy TB testing units. It has been evidenced that acid-fast bacilli (AFB) microscopy’s yield highly depends on the staining technique and reading ability of the laboratory personnel. For the quality of TB testing in the country, the TB control program set up a Randomized Blinded Rechecking (RBRC) program in 2008 to monitor the testing performance of laboratories to continuously improve the reliability and efficiency of results. This is the first study to determine the effectiveness and impact of the RBRC program on the performance of the participating laboratories in Uganda.
Methods
This was a retrospective cross-sectional study based on a record review of the RBRC’s annual results compilations between January 2008 and December 2017.
Results
Between January 2008 and December 2017, a total of 265,523 smears were re-checked during the RBRC program. The number of enrolled laboratories in the RBRC program rose from 660 to 2008 to 1,406 in 2017. The RBRC program resulted in a statistically significant reduction in microscopy errors, with false positives decreasing from 12.8% to 2008 to 7.6% in 2017, false positive errors decreasing from 10 to 6.3%, false negative errors decreasing from 2.9 to 0.7%, quantification errors decreasing from 6.0 to 1.8%, and the overall sensitivity of smear microscopy compared to the controllers increased with statistical significance from 93 to 97%.
Conclusion
The study reveals an overall significant error reduction and an improved sensitivity of smear microscopy upon continuous implementation of the RBRC program in an AFB microscopy TB laboratory network. Implementation of a RBRC program is crucial and essential to maintaining a reliable TB laboratory service that can facilitate accurate diagnosis and offset the disadvantages of using smear microscopy.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Infectious Diseases
Reference32 articles.
1. Hershkovitz I, Donoghue HD, Minnikin DE, May H, Lee OY, Feldman M et al. Tuberculosis origin: The Neolithic scenario. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2015; 95 Suppl 1: S122–6 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25726364, accessed 16 October 2019).
2. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2019. World Health Organization; 2019.
3. World health organization. : The global plan to stop TB 2011–2015: Transforming the fight towards elimination of Tuberculosis. http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44437.
4. Rieder HL, Chonde TM, Myking H, et al. The public health service national tuberculosis reference laboratory and the national laboratory network. Paris, France: International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease; 1998.
5. Azizz MA. External quality assessment for AFB smear microscopy. 2002. https://www.aphl.org/aboutAPHL/publications/Documents/External_Quality_Assessment_for_AFB_Smear_Microscopy.pdf.