Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Understanding the perception and practices of ophthalmologists for trachoma is important to develop interventions aimed at disease elimination in Egypt. The survey investigated: (1) the views and practice patterns of Egyptian ophthalmologists for trachoma and (2) the influence of geographic location, setting, and years of practice on ophthalmologists’ perceptions.
Methods
A questionnaire sent to ophthalmologists currently working in Egypt collected information on: (1) demographics, (2) caseload and practice patterns for trachoma, (3) 13 Likert scale questions regarding the current state of trachoma, and (4) two open-ended written response questions.
Results
Of the 500 recipients, 194 ophthalmologists participated. 98% of the respondents reported seeing trachoma patients in their practice. 28.8% agreed that trachoma is currently an active health problem in Egypt, with ophthalmologists in public practice having significantly higher agreement scores compared to private practitioners (p = 0.030). Rural ophthalmologists were significantly more likely to agree that a targeted trachoma control program is needed in their location of practice compared to their urban counterparts (p < 0.001). Open-ended questions revealed recurrent themes, including the rural distribution of trachoma patients and the high volume of patients with corneal opacity.
Conclusion
Ophthalmologists’ experiences with trachoma in Egypt differed based on practice setting, years in practice, and location, and the overall perception of the impact of the disease remains low. However, there was widespread agreement that trachoma is present in communities across the country. Practitioners in rural areas and in the public sector shared a disproportionate burden of the trachoma caseload. The perspectives of such ophthalmologists must be emphasized in decision-making related to trachoma interventions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. Hadfield J, Harris SR, Seth-Smith HM, Parmar S, Andersson P, Giffard PM, Schachter J, Moncada J, Ellison L, Vaulet MLG. Comprehensive global genome dynamics of Chlamydia trachomatis show ancient diversification followed by contemporary mixing and recent lineage expansion. Genome Res. 2017;27:1220–9.
2. Solomon AW, Willis R, Pavluck AL, Alemayehu W, Bakhtiari A, Bovill S, Chu BK, Courtright P, Dejene M, Downs P. Quality assurance and quality control in the global trachoma mapping project. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;99:858.
3. Emerson PM, Burton M, Solomon AW, Bailey R, Mabey D. The SAFE strategy for trachoma control: using operational research for policy, planning and implementation. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84:613–9.
4. Dodson S, Heggen A, Solomon AW, Sarah V, Woods G, Wohlgemuth L. Behavioural change interventions for sustained trachoma elimination. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96:723.
5. World Health Organization. WHO alliance for the global elimination of trachoma: progress report on elimination of trachoma, 2021. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2022;97:353–64.