Author:
Usmael Umer Ahmed,Tesema Nega Berhane,Girma Selfu,Kendie Desalegn Adane,Abas Musin Kelel
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Visceral leishmaniasis is caused by the Leishmania donovani species complex that can spread to internal organs and leading to death if not treated on time. Diagnosis of leishmaniasis is based on clinical signs and symptoms, microscopy, serological and molecular techniques. Because of a broad spectrum of diverse clinical manifestations and similarities of the responses to different species, identification to the species level is often difficult for the proper patient treatment and management. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the PCR- RFLP assay of the ITS1 region for identification of L. donovani species from clinical smear slide patient samples.
Method
DNA extraction was performed on a total of 90 smear slide samples using phenol—chloroform method. The PCR detection limit was determined by L. donovani reference strain DNA. The ITS1 region was amplified at 320 bp using LITSR/L5.8S genus specific primers and then the ITS1-PCR products were subjected to RFLP assay for confirmation of L. donovani species using HaeIII restriction enzyme.
Results
Of the total samples ITS1-PCR revealed the true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative results of 42 (46.7%), 6 (6.7%), 37 (41.1%) and 5 (5.6%), respectively. Considering microscopy as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values of the ITS1- PCR technique was 89.4%, 86.0%, 87.5%, and 88.1% respectively. All ITS1-PCR positive clinical samples were confirmed as L. donovani species by PCR–RFLP patterns.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the ITS1- RFLP method is highly sensitive and more specific for identification of L. donovani species in the smear negative clinical samples of visceral leishmaniasis patients. There is also significant association and degree of agreement between the two methods. For direct identification of L. donovani species from clinical samples, irrespective of genus and species level, PCR–RFLP is more recommendable than a microscope.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Galluzzi L, Ceccarelli M, Diotallevi A, Menotta M, Magnani M. Real-time PCR applications for diagnosis of leishmaniasis. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11(1):1–13.
2. Haddad MHF, Ghasemi E, Maraghi S, Tavala M. Identification of Leishmania species isolated from human cutaneous leishmaniasis in Mehran, Western Iran using nested PCR. Iran J Parasitol. 2016;11(1):65.
3. Owino BO, Matoke-Muhia D, Alraey Y, Mwangi JM, Ingonga JM, Ngumbi PM, et al. Association of Phlebotomus guggisbergi with Leishmania major and Leishmania tropica in a complex transmission setting for cutaneous leishmaniasis in Gilgil, Nakuru County, Kenya. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(10): e0007712.
4. World Health Organization. Report of Meeting of the Regional Technical Advisory Group (RTAG) on visceral leishmaniasis and the national visceral leishmaniasis programme managers of endemic member states. World Health Organization. Regional Office for South-East Asia; 2020.
5. Mouttaki T, Morales-Yuste M, Merino-Espinosa G, Chiheb S, Fellah H, Martin-Sanchez J, et al. Molecular diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis and identification of the causative Leishmania species in Morocco by using three PCR-based assays. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7(1):1–9.