Author:
Takayama Yoshihiro,Xu Yining S.,Shimakawa Yusuke,Chowell Gerardo,Kozuka Masahiro,Omori Ryosuke,Matsuyama Ryota,Yamamoto Taro,Mizumoto Kenji
Abstract
Abstract
Background
While airport screening measures for COVID-19 infected passengers at international airports worldwide have been greatly relaxed, observational studies evaluating fever screening alone at airports remain scarce. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively assess the effectiveness of fever screening at airports in preventing the influx of COVID-19 infected persons.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective epidemiological analysis of fever screening implemented at 9 airports in Okinawa Prefecture from May 2020 to March 2022. The number of passengers covered during the same period was 9,003,616 arriving at 9 airports in Okinawa Prefecture and 5,712,983 departing passengers at Naha Airport. The capture rate was defined as the proportion of reported COVID-19 cases who would have passed through airport screening to the number of suspected cases through fever screening at the airport, and this calculation used passengers arriving at Naha Airport and surveillance data collected by Okinawa Prefecture between May 2020 and March 2021.
Results
From May 2020 to March 2021, 4.09 million people were reported to pass through airports in Okinawa. During the same period, at least 122 people with COVID-19 infection arrived at the airports in Okinawa, but only a 10 suspected cases were detected; therefore, the capture rate is estimated to be up to 8.2% (95% CI: 4.00-14.56%). Our result of a fever screening rate is 0.0002% (95%CI: 0.0003–0.0006%) (10 suspected cases /2,971,198 arriving passengers). The refusal rate of passengers detected by thermography who did not respond to temperature measurements was 0.70% (95% CI: 0.19–1.78%) (4 passengers/572 passengers).
Conclusions
This study revealed that airport screening based on thermography alone missed over 90% of COVID-19 infected cases, indicating that thermography screening may be ineffective as a border control measure. The fact that only 10 febrile cases were detected after screening approximately 3 million passengers suggests the need to introduce measures targeting asymptomatic infections, especially with long incubation periods. Therefore, other countermeasures, e.g. preboarding RT-PCR testing, are highly recommended during an epidemic satisfying World Health Organization (WHO) Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) criteria with pathogen characteristics similar or exceeding SARS-CoV-2, especially when traveling to rural cities with limited medical resources.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Japan Science and Technology Agency
the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science & Technology of Japan
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Aidan Findlater, Isaac I, Bogoch. Human mobility and the global spread of infectious diseases: a focus on Air Travel. Trends Parasitol. 2018;34(9):772–83.
2. COVID-19. Current Japanese Border Measures, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. [cited 2023 July/6] https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/covid-19/bordercontrol.html
3. World Health Organization. Statement on the fifteenth meeting of the IHR. (2005) Emergency Committee on the COVID-19 pandemic. 5 May 2023. [cited 2023 July/6] https://www.who.int/news/item/05-05-2023-statement-on-the-fifteenth-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-pandemic
4. Normile D. Airport screening is largely futile, research shows. Science. 2020;367:1177–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.367.6483.1177
5. Dollard P, Griffin I, Berro A, Cohen NJ, Singler K, Haber Y, et al. Risk Assessment and Management of COVID-19 among travelers arriving at designated U.S. airports, January 17-September 13, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(45):1681–5. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6945a4
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献