Effectiveness and safety of artesunate–amodiaquine versus artemether–lumefantrine for home-based treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria among children 6–120 months in Yaoundé, Cameroon: a randomized trial

Author:

Niba Peter Thelma Ngwa,Nji Akindeh Mbuh,Ali Innocent Mbulli,Akam Lawrence Fonyonga,Dongmo Cedric Hermann,Chedjou Jean Paul Kengne,Fomboh Calvino Tah,Nana William Dorian,Oben Ornella Laetitia Ayem,Selly-Ngaloumo Abdel Aziz,Moyeh Marcel N.,Ngu Jude Achidi,Ludovic Ambassa Jean,Aboh Pierre Martiniel,Ambani Marie Carine Enyegue,Omgba Pierrette Albertine Mbarga,Kotcholi Grâce Bissohong,Adzemye Linus Moye,Nna Danielle Regine Abenkou,Douanla Adèle,Ango Ze,Ewane Marie Sophie,Ticha Joel Tewara,Tatah Fritz Mbuh,Dinza Golwa,Ndikum Valentine Nchafor,Fosah Dorothy A.,Bigoga Jude D.,Alifrangis Michael,Mbacham Wilfred F.

Abstract

Abstract Background Many studies have reported high efficacy and safety of artesunate-amodiaquine (AS-AQ) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) when administered under direct observation in Cameroon. There is paucity of data to support their continuous use in home-based treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Cameroon. Hence, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of AS-AQ versus AL for home-based treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria among children 6120 months in Yaoundé, Cameroon. Methods A two-arm, open-label, randomized, controlled trial comparing the equivalence of AS-AQ (experimental group) and AL (control group) was carried out from May 2019 to April 2020 at two secondary hospitals in Yaoundé. Participants were randomized to receive either AS-AQ or AL. After the first dose, antimalarial drugs were given at home, rather than under direct observation by a study staff. The conventional on-treatment and post-treatment laboratory and clinical evaluations were not done until day 3 of the full antimalarial treatment course. The evaluation of effectiveness was mainly based on per protocol polymerase chain reaction adjusted adequate clinical and parasitological response (PP PCR adjusted ACPR) on day 28 post-treatment. Safety was based on assessment of adverse events (AEs) and severe adverse events (SAEs) from day 1 to day 28. Results A total of 242 children were randomized to receive AS-AQ (n = 114) and AL (n = 128). The PP PCR adjusted day 28 cure rates were [AS-AQ = 96.9% (95% CI, 91.299.4) versus AL = 95.5% (95% CI, 89.998.5), P = 0.797]. Expected mild to moderate adverse events were reported in both arms [AS-AQ = 83 (84.7%) versus AL = 99 (86.1%), P = 0.774]. The most common adverse events included: transient changes of hematologic indices and fever. Conclusions This study demonstrated that AS-AQ and AL are effective and safe for home management of malaria in Yaoundé. The evidence from this study supports the parallel use of the two drugs in routine practice. However, the findings from this study do not describe the likely duration of antimalarial effectiveness in holoendemic areas where multiple courses of treatment might be required. Trial registration: This study is a randomized controlled trial and it was retrospectively registered on 23/09/2020 at ClinicalTrials.gov with registration number NCT04565184.

Funder

AAS/AESA/Wellcome trust UK

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Infectious Diseases

Reference68 articles.

1. WHO. World Malaria Report 2021. Geneva, World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240040496. Accessed on 26 Jan2022.

2. WHO briefing on Malaria Treatment Guidelines and artemisinin monotherapies. https://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/meeting_briefing19april.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2021.

3. WHO. Geneva, World Health Organization 2009. Methods for surveillance of antimalarial drug efficacy. https://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/meeting_briefing19april.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2019.

4. WHO. Geneva, World Health Organization 2015. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. Third edition. https://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/9789241549127/en/. Accessed15 Jul 2020.

5. WHO. Geneva, World Health Organization. Tackling antimalarial drug resistance. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/WHO-UCN-GMP-2020.07. Accessed 3 May 2021.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3