Author:
Chow B.,Groeschel M.,Carson J.,Griener T.,Church D. L.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study evaluated the performance of a novel fast broad range PCR and sequencing (FBR-PCR/S) assay for the improved diagnosis of invasive fungal disease (IFD) in high-risk patients in a large Canadian healthcare region.
Methods
A total of 114 clinical specimens (CS) including bronchoalveolar lavages (BALs) were prospectively tested from 107 patients over a 2-year period. Contrived BALs (n = 33) inoculated with known fungi pathogens were also tested to increase diversity. Patient characteristics, fungal stain and culture results were collected from the laboratory information system. Dual-priming oligonucleotide (DPO) primers targeted to the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) (~ 350 bp) and large subunit (LSU) (~ 550 bp) gene regions were used to perform FBR-PCR/S assays on extracted BALs/CS. The performance of the molecular test was evaluated against standard microbiological methods and clinical review for the presence of IFD.
Results
The 107 patients were predominantly male (67, 62.6%) with a mean age of 59 years (range = 0–85 years): 74 (69.2%) patients had at least one underlying comorbidity: 19 (34.5%) had confirmed and 12 (21.8%) had probable IFD. Culture recovered 66 fungal isolates from 55 BALs/CS with Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. being most common. For BALs, the molecular assay vs. standard methods had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), and efficiency of 88.5% vs.100%, 100% vs. 61.1%, 100% vs. 88.5%, 61.1% vs. 100%, and 90.2% for both. For other CS, the molecular assay had similar performance to standard methods with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and efficiency of 66.7%, 87.0%, 66.7%, 87.0% and 81.3% for both methods. Both methods also performed similarly, regardless of whether CS stain/microscopy showed yeast/fungal elements. FBR-PCR/S assays results were reported in ~ 8 h compared to fungal cultures that took between 4 and 6 weeks.
Conclusions
Rapid molecular testing compared to standard methods have equivalent diagnostic efficiency but improves clinical utility by reporting a rapid species-level identification the same dayshift (~ 8 h).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Ford ES, Duke ER, Cheng GS, Yoke LM, Liu C, Hill JA, Pergam SA, Pipavath SNJ, Walter RB, Mielcarek M, et al. Outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with mixed response to pretransplantation treatment of confirmed or suspected invasive fungal infection. Transplant Cell Ther. 2021;27:684.
2. Tey A, Shaw B, Cardamone L, Shepherd S, Paul E, Rogers B, Shortt J. Risk factors for invasive fungal infection in 5-azacytidine treated patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Eur J Haematol. 2021;107:181.
3. Rinaldi M, Bartoletti M, Ferrarese A, Franceschini E, Campoli C, Coladonato S, Pascale R, Tedeschi S, Gatti M, Cricca M, et al. Breakthrough invasive fungal infection after liver transplantation in patients on targeted antifungal prophylaxis: a prospective multicentre study. Transpl Infect Dis. 2021;23:e13608.
4. Donnelly JP, Chen SC, Kauffman CA, Steinbach WJ, Baddley JW, Verweij PE, Clancy CJ, Wingard JR, Lockhart SR, Groll AH, et al. Revision and update of the consensus definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European organization for research and treatment of cancer and the mycoses study group education and research consortium. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(6):1367–76.
5. Li Y, Gao Y, Niu X, Wu Y, Du Y, Yang Y, Qi R, Chen H, Gao X, Song B, et al. A 5-year review of invasive fungal infection at an academic medical center. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:553648.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献