Author:
Lampl Christian,MaassenVanDenBrink Antoinette,Deligianni Christina I.,Gil-Gouveia Raquel,Jassal Tanvir,Sanchez-del-Rio Margarita,Reuter Uwe,Uluduz Derya,Versijpt Jan,Zeraatkar Dena,Sacco Simona
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
While there are several trials that support the efficacy of various drugs for migraine prophylaxis against placebo, there is limited evidence addressing the comparative safety and efficacy of these drugs. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to facilitate comparison between drugs for migraine prophylaxis.
Methods
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov from inception to August 13, 2022, for randomized trials of pharmacological treatments for migraine prophylaxis in adults. Reviewers worked independently and in duplicate to screen references, extract data, and assess risk of bias. We performed a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis and rated the certainty (quality) of evidence as either high, moderate, low, or very low using the GRADE approach.
Results
We identified 74 eligible trials, reporting on 32,990 patients. We found high certainty evidence that monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor (CGRP(r)mAbs), gepants, and topiramate increase the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, compared to placebo. We found moderate certainty evidence that beta-blockers, valproate, and amitriptyline increase the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, and low certainty evidence that gabapentin may not be different from placebo. We found high certainty evidence that, compared to placebo, valproate and amitriptyline lead to substantial adverse events leading to discontinuation, moderate certainty evidence that topiramate, beta-blockers, and gabapentin increase adverse events leading to discontinuation, and moderate to high certainty evidence that (CGRP(r)mAbs) and gepants do not increase adverse events.
Conclusions
(CGRP(r)mAbs) have the best safety and efficacy profile of all drugs for migraine prophylaxis, followed closely by gepants.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Neurology (clinical),General Medicine
Reference115 articles.
1. Blumenfeld AM, Varon SF, Wilcox TK, Buse DC, Kawata AK, Manack A et al (2011) Disability, HRQoL and resource use among chronic and episodic migraineurs: results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). Cephalalgia 31:301–315
2. SteinerTJ SLJ, Katsarava Z, Lainez JM, Lampl C, Lantéri-Minet M et al (2014) The impact of headache in Europe: principal results of the Eurolight project. J Headache Pain 5:31
3. Lampl C, Thomas H, Stovner LJ, Tassorelli C, Katsarava Z, Laínez JM et al (2016) Interictal burden attributable to episodic headache: findings from the Eurolight project. J Headache Pain 7:9
4. Linde M, Gustavsson A, Stovner LJ, Steiner TJ, Barré J, Katsarava Z, Lainez JM et al (2012) The cost of headache disorders in Europe: the Eurolight project. Eur J Neurol 19:703-e43
5. Siddiqui M, Shah PV, Balani P, Lopez AR, Nobleza CMN, Khan S (2021) Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, and Superiority of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies and Botox in Preventing and Treating Migraines. Cureus 13:e13002
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献