Abstract
Abstract
Background
The accurate prediction of viscosity in nanofluids is essential for comprehending their flow behavior and enhancing their effectiveness in different industries. This research delves into modeling the viscosity of nanofluids and assessing various models through cross-validation techniques. The models are compared based on the root mean square error of the cross-validation sets, which served as the selection criteria.
The main body of the abstract
Four feature selection algorithms namely the minimum redundancy maximum relevance, F-test, RReliefF were evaluated to identify the most influential features for viscosity prediction. The feature selection based on physical meaning was the algorithm that yielded the best results, as outlined in this study. This methodology takes into account the physical relevance of most aspects of the nanofluid's viscosity. To assess the predictive performance of the models, a cross-validation process was conducted, which provided a robust evaluation. The root mean squared error of the validation sets was used to compare the models. This rigorous evaluation identified the most accurate and reliable model for predicting nanofluid viscosity.
Results
The results showed that the novel feature selection algorithm outclassed the established approaches in predicting the viscosity of single material nanofluid. The proposed feature selection algorithm had a root mean squared error of 0.022 and an r squared value of 0.9941 for the validation set, while for the test set, the root mean squared error was 0.0146, the mean squared error was 0.0157, the r squared value was 0.9924.
Conclusions
This research provides valuable insights into nanofluid viscosity and offers guidance on choosing the most suitable features for viscosity modeling. The study also highlights the importance of using physical meaning to select features and cross-validation to assess model performance. The models developed in this study can be helpful in predicting nanofluid viscosity and optimizing their use in different industrial processes.
Funder
Tertiary Education Trust Fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference32 articles.
1. Aggarwal N, Shukla U, Saxena GJ, Rawat M, Bafila AS, Singh S, Pundir A (2023) Mean based relief: an improved feature selection method based on ReliefF. Appl Intell. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-023-04662-w
2. Bhaumik B, Chaturvedi S, Changdar S, De S (2023) A unique physics-aided deep learning model for predicting viscosity of nanofluids. Int J Comput Methods Eng Sci Mech 24(3):167–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502287.2022.2120441
3. Brownlee J (2016) XGBoost With python: Gradient boosted trees with XGBoost and scikit-learn. Mach Learn Mastery
4. Buongiorno J, Venerus DC, Prabhat N, McKrell T, Townsend J, Christianson R, Tolmachev YV, Keblinski P, Hu L-W, Alvarado JL (2009) A benchmark study on the thermal conductivity of nanofluids. J Appl Phys 106(9):094312. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3245330
5. Çalişkan A (2023) In brain tumor detection, training of mr images created by heat map technique with cnn models-extraction of type-based activation sets and selection of best features by mrmr method. Int Res Eng Sci 5:7
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Optimising Al2O3–water nanofluid;Bulletin of the National Research Centre;2024-01-02