Abstract
Abstract
Background
Globally, urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the leading cause of hospital visits, especially among women. In many developing countries, especially in lower health facilities, the dipstick urinalysis is the most commonly requested test, as urine culture is not routinely performed. The dipstick test can potentially reduce the number of patients who could be treated with empirical antibiotics and reduce the burden of antibiotic resistance. The current study determined the utility of dipstick urinalysis in diagnosing UTIs using urine culture as a gold standard method.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted between July and November 2021. The study involved 1327 outpatients attending lower health centres in Mwanza (n = 678) and Dar es Salaam (n = 649) regions. The samples were subjected to dipstick urinalysis (nitrite and leucocytes) and quantitative bacterial culture.
Results
Of all 1326 patient samples, 808(60.9%) and 48(3.6%) were positive for urinary leucocyte and nitrite, respectively, while significant urine culture was found in 364(27.4%). leucocyte test correctly diagnosed UTI in 283 (77.75%) and nitrite test in 36 (9.89%). The leucocytes and nitrites, in combination, exhibited a sensitivity of 79.40% and NPV of 85.24% but a lower specificity of 44.96% and a lower PPV of 35.29%. Urinary leucocyte test had a higher discrimination ability to detect urinary tract infection than urinary nitrite test (AUC = 0.073, 95% CI 0.043–0.103, p < 0.001); likewise, combined results of urinary nitrite and leucocytes tests had higher discrimination ability to detect UTI than nitrite only (AUC = − 0.079, 95% CI − 0.107–0.050, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
In settings where culture is available, dipstick urinalysis can be a helpful screening method for reducing unnecessary urine cultures and related expenses because of its higher negative predictive value. In most low-resource settings where patients' diagnosis solely depends on clinical diagnosis and culture is not easily available, urine dipstick can decrease the risk of overuse of antibiotics. However, the combined (leucocytes and nitrites) dipstick urinalysis has a rather low positive predictive value, with approximately one-third of cases giving positive test results being truly UTI, subjecting over 65% of cases to unnecessary antibiotic treatment.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference20 articles.
1. Bates B (2013) Interpretation of urinalysis and urine culture for UTI treatment. Pharm Fac US Pharm 38(11):65–68
2. Childers R, Liotta B, Brennan J et al (2022) Urine testing is associated with inappropriate antibiotic use and increased length of stay in emergency department patients. Heliyon 8:e11049. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2022.E11049
3. Dadzie I, Quansah E, Puopelle Dakorah M, Abiade V, Takyi-Amuah E, Adusei R (2019) The effectiveness of dipstick for the detection of urinary tract infection. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 23:2019
4. Demilie T, Beyene G, Melaku S, Tsegaye W (2014) Diagnostic accuracy of rapid urine dipstick test to predict urinary tract infection among pregnant women in Felege Hiwot referral Hospital, Bahir Dar. North West Ethiopia BMC Res Notes 7:481. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-481
5. Flokas ME, Andreatos N, Alevizakos M et al (2017) Inappropriate management of asymptomatic patients with positive urine cultures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Forum Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1093/OFID/OFX207