Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of radiation exposure and storage time on the degree of conversion (DC%) and flexural strength (FS) of three different resin composites. In total, 90 disk-shaped, and 360 rod-shaped composite specimens were prepared to evaluate the DC% and FS, respectively. Specimens were divided into 18 groups (DC%: n = 5 and FS: n = 20) according to the three experimental factors of the study: 1—Radiation (no-exposure and exposure), 2—Resin composite material (Herculite XRV Ultra, Z250 XT and Grandio), and 3—Storage time (24 h in distilled water, 3-m and 6-m in 70% ethanol). Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR) was used to determine the DC%. For FS, the specimens were subjected to a three-point bending test at 1 mm/min crosshead speed. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA/Tukey HSD test. Significant level was set at P = 0.05.
Results
For DC%, there was no significant difference between no-radiation exposure and radiation exposure (P > 0.05). Herculite XRV Ultra revealed the highest statistically significant DC% (P < 0.05). The 24-h storage time revealed the least significant DC% (P < 0.05). For FS, radiation exposure showed a statistically significant higher value compared to no-radiation exposure (P < 0.05). Herculite XRV Ultra showed the least FS value (P < 0.05). The 24-h storage time showed the highest significant value (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
Radiation exposure has no significant impact on the DC% of the different resin composites, but it has a significant positive effect on the FS. Storage time had a significant effect on both DC% and FS.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference72 articles.
1. Abed YA, Sabry H, Alrobeigy NA (2015) Degree of conversion and surface hardness of bulk-fill composite versus incremental-fill composite. Tanta Dent J 12:71–80
2. Albdiry MT, Yousif BF, Ku H (2013) Fracture toughness and toughening mechanisms of unsaturated polyester-based clay nanocomposites. In: The 13th international conference on fracture (ICF) 16–21 June, Beijing
3. Alshali RZ, Silikas N, Satterthwaite JD (2013) Degree of conversion of bulk-fill compared to conventional resin-composites at two time intervals. Dent Mater 29(9):e213–e217
4. Amirouche-Korichi A, Mouzali M, Watts DC (2009) Effects of monomer ratios and highly radiopaque fillers on degree of conversion and shrinkage-strain of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 25(11):1411e8
5. Arener SH (1974) Introduction to physical metallurgy, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill, London