Clarifying values: an updated review-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Clarifying values: an updated review

Published:2013-11 Issue:S2 Volume:13 Page:
ISSN:1472-6947
Container-title:BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
language:en
Short-container-title:BMC Med Inform Decis Mak

Author:

Fagerlin Angela,Pignone Michael,Abhyankar Purva,Col Nananda,Feldman-Stewart Deb,Gavaruzzi Teresa,Kryworuchko Jennifer,Levin Carrie A,Pieterse Arwen H,Reyna Valerie,Stiggelbout Anne,Scherer Laura D,Wills Celia,Witteman Holly O

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Informatics,Health Policy,Computer Science Applications

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S8.pdf

Reference16 articles.

1. Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A, Thomson R, Barratt A, Barry M, Bernstein S, Butow P, Clarke A, Entwistle V, Feldman-Stewart D, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Moumjid N, Mulley A, Ruland C, Sepucha K, Sykes A, Whelan T: Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006, 333: 417-10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE.

2. de Vries M, Fagerlin A, Witteman H, Scherer LD: Combining deliberation and intuition in patient decision support. Patient Educ Couns. 2013, 91 (2): 154-60. 10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.016.

3. Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Crump RT: Decision support for patients: values clarification and preference elicitation. Med Care Res Rev. 2013, 70 (1 suppl): 50S-79S. 10.1177/1077558712461182.

4. Bekker HL: The loss of reason in patient decision aid research: do checklists damage the quality of informed choice interventions?. Patient Educ Couns. 2010, 78: 357-364. 10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.002.

5. Durand MA, Stiel M, Boivin J, Elwyn G: Where is the theory? Evaluating the theoretical frameworks described in decision support technologies. Patient Educ Couns. 2008, 71: 125-135. 10.1016/j.pec.2007.12.004.

Cited by 200 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Impact of a patient-centered tool to reduce misconceptions about coronary artery disease and its treatment: The CAD roadmap;PEC Innovation;2024-12

2. Values and preferences towards the use of prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin during pregnancy: a convergent mixed-methods secondary analysis of data from the decision analysis in shared decision making for thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy (DASH-TOP) study;Thrombosis Journal;2024-09-06

3. Supporting the Choice for Conservative and Surgical Treatment in Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Development and Evaluation of a Patient Decision Aid;Neurourology and Urodynamics;2024-09-05

4. Where there is no genetic counselor: An online decision-aid supports the majority of parents’ diagnostic genomic testing choices for their children;Genetics in Medicine;2024-09

5. Voices of experience: what Dutch parents teach us about values and intuition in periviable decisions;Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition;2024-08-17