Abstract
Abstract
Background
Studying the floristic diversity of a certain forest is a basic aspect of the design and management of forest vegetation; and consequently this study focused on the plant diversity and community analysis of the Sele-Nono forest. For the current study, plants were sampled from 90 plots using a stratified random sampling technique along the established strata of the study forest. In all the plots, both floristic and environmental data that were relevant to the study were collected following the state of the art. Based on the collected data, the community types, ordination, floristic diversity, and threats to the forest were analyzed using R-package and SPSS software.
Results
Cluster analysis produced seven distinct community types which significantly differed among themselves (Cophentic correlation coefficient = 0.785, P < 0.001) of which community types 2 and 6 were relatively poor; whereas communities 1 and 4 were rich in terms of their species richness and diversity. In addition, Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) suggests that a number of environmental factors such as altitude and slope (topographic factor), OM and N (edaphic factors) and disturbance were the main drivers for the current distribution of plant species and disparity in plant community composition in Sele-Nono forest. Moreover, the study revealed high beta diversity ($${\beta }_{w}$$
β
w
>12) of plant species at the landscape level (i.e., throughout the study forest). Deforestation for agricultural land expansion and degradation through selective logging are the main threats to the Sele-Nono forest.
Conclusions
The present study revealed that the Sele-Nono forest is a large and heterogenous forest at the landscape level (150, 325.27 ha; $${\beta }_{w}$$
β
w
>12). Moreover, it is one of the richest and diverse forest ecosystems in terms of plant biodiversity, and it could qualify to be labeled as a keystone ecosystem. However, currently it is exposed to a variety of threats. We recommend the forest to be developed into a biosphere reserve. We also recommend the prioritization of areas belonging to community types 2 and 6 of the forest for any possible conservation actions so as to maximize species richness and diversity of the native plants of the area.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference217 articles.
1. Abebe T (2002) The influence of selective logging on residual stand and regeneration in a tropical rainforest in south-western Ethiopia. Acta Univ Agric Suec Silv 261:1–68
2. Adams WM, Hulme D (2001) If community conservation is the answer in Africa, what is the question? Oryx 35(3):193–200
3. Addi A, Soromessa T, Kelbessa E, Dibaba A, Kefalew A (2016) Floristic composition and plant community types of Agama Forest, an “Afromontane Forest” in Southwest Ethiopia. J Ecol Nat Environ 8(5):55–69
4. Addi A, Soromessa T, Bareke T (2020) Plant diversity and community analysis of Gesha and Sayilem Forest in Kaffa Zone, southwestern Ethiopia. Biodiversitas 21:2878–2888
5. Addo-Fordjour P, Rahmad ZB, Amui J, Pinto C, Dwomoh M (2013) Patterns of liana community in a tropical diversity and stracture in a tropical rainforest reserve, Ghana: effects of human disturbance. Afr J Ecol 51(2):217–227
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献