Abstract
Abstract
Background
Fundamental morphologic differences between male and female pelvises are historically recognised. Despite this, little consideration has been given as to whether or not conventional positioning supports used for primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed in the lateral position do an equally effective job of maintaining the intended set up position when comparing genders. Given that recent research has highlighted that unintended pelvic roll occurs commonly during hip surgery, and that such movement may have a mechanically-deleterious consequence upon final construct performance and complication rates, this study was undertaken to explore the differences in pelvic roll between genders.
Methods
The output of a high-precision, commercially-available, imageless intra-operative navigation system was prospectively-collected for 85 consecutive patients undergoing unilateral, primary THAs. These data were separated by gender and were utilised to determine differences in pelvic movement around a central sagittal axis.
Results
Demographic data were similar between genders, with no between-group differences in mean BMI (p = 0.09) or indication for surgery (p = 0.66), however participating males (mean 68.04) were slightly younger than females (mean 73.31). The mean anterior pelvic roll for females was 9.50°, and for males 8.68°. There were no statistically significant independent correlations observed between gender (p = 0.21) and pelvic roll.
Conclusion
The findings of this novel study do not suggest gender differences in the magnitude of unintended, intra-operative, anterior roll, even when corrected for BMI and surgical indication. Average roll of ~ 9° was demonstrated across both groups. An awareness of such positional change during THA surgery may reduce potentially-avoidable post-operative complications.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference16 articles.
1. Churchill SE, Vansickle C. Pelvic morphology in homo erectus and early homo. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2017;300(5):964–77.
2. DeSilva JM, Rosenberg KR. Anatomy, development, and function of the human pelvis. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2017;300(4):628–32.
3. Lewis CL, Laudicina NM, Khuu A, Loverro KL. The human pelvis: variation in structure and function during gait. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2017;300(4):633–42.
4. Caldwell WE, Moloy HC. Anatomical variations in the female pelvis: their classification and obstetrical significance: (section of obstetrics and gynaecology). Proc R Soc Med. 1938;32(1):1–30.
5. Beverland DE, O’Neill CKJ, Rutherford M, Molloy D, Hill JC. Placement of the acetabular component. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(1 Suppl A):37–43.