Author:
Pan Xiyu,Qiao Jun,Liu Zhen,Sun Xu,Zhu Zezhang
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Scoliosis behavior after curettage of spinal osteoid osteoma has been not clarified as most studies regarding scoliosis secondary to osteoid osteoma (OO) were case reports. The aims of this study were to investigate (1) clinical and radiographic features of scoliosis secondary to OO; (2) scoliosis behavior after Curettage of OO.
Methods
A retrospective study was performed at patients who were diagnosed as OO clinically or pathologically from July 1998 to December 2019 in a single institution. Age, gender, location of pain, location of lesion and curve pattern of scoliosis were collected preoperatively. Intraoperative blood loss, operation time and surgical complications were documented. VAS scores and curve magnitude were collected pre- and postoperatively and at last follow-up.
Results
The mean operation time was 124 ± 32 min and the average intraoperative blood loss was 274 ± 134 ml. The mean preoperative VAS score was 6.2 ± 2.7, and the mean postoperative VAS score was 2.1 ± 1.8. Thoracic scoliosis was improved from 22.7 ± 10.6° to 6.2 ± 4.3° after operation, and to 4.1 ± 4.3° at last follow-up. Lumbar scoliosis was improved from 18.1 ± 7.4° to 6.7 ± 5.2° after operation, and to 5.3 ± 3.9° at last follow-up. Trunk shift was improved from 34.7 ± 12.4 to 10.5 ± 7.2 mm after operation, and to 8.4 ± 5.6 mm at last follow-up. There was no significant differences as to sagittal radiographic parameters (P > 0.05).
Conclusion
Patients with spinal OO had a significantly high incidence of scoliosis. Patients could get rapid relief of pain and scoliosis with low occurrence. Night pain, pain at the concave side of curve, normal sagittal alignment could help differentiate it from scoliosis associated with lumbar disc herniation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery
Reference16 articles.
1. Jaffe HL. Benign osteoblastoma. Bull Hosp Joint Dis. 1956;17(2):141–51.
2. Greenspan A. Benign bone-forming lesions: osteoma, osteoid osteoma, and osteoblastoma: clinical, imaging, pathologic, and differential considerations. Skeletal Radiol. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209095.
3. Resnick D, Kyriakos M, Greenway G. Tumors and tumor-like lesions of bone: Imaging and pathology of specific lesions. In: Resnick D, editor. Diagosis of Bone and Joint Disorders, vol. 3. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1995. p. 3628–57.
4. Kan P, Schmidt MH. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma of the spine. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2007.09.003.
5. Saifuddin A, White J, Sherazi Z, Shaikh MI, Natali C, Ransford AO. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma of the spine. Factors associated with the presence of scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199801010-00010.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献