Author:
Guo Zhanpeng,Guo Yue,Wang Yansong,Bi Yunlong,Deng Yu,Cao Yang,Huang Mina
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The minimally invasive approach for the treatment of displaced scapular neck or body fractures has the advantages of less trauma and minimal muscle dissection. In clinical practice, the minimally invasive approach combined with an anatomical locking plate has been used to treat scapular body fractures. In addition, we have made minor modifications to the minimally invasive approach. However, the biomechanical study about the approach combined with an anatomical locking plate in treating scapular body fractures was limited.
Methods
Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to conduct the biomechanical comparison between the anatomical locking plate (AP model) and reconstructive plate (RP model) in the treatment of scapular body fractures through the modified minimally invasive approach. A healthy male volunteer with no history of scapula or systemic diseases was recruited. High-resolution computed tomography images of his right scapula were obtained. Two scapula models were constructed and analyzed by the software of Mimics 21.0, Geomagic Wrap 2021, SolidWorks 2021, and ANSYS Workbench 2022, respectively.
Results
Through static structural analysis, in terms of equivalent von Mises stress, equivalent elastic strain, and total deformation, the AP model exhibited superior safety characteristics, enhanced flexibility, and anticipated stability compared with the RP model. This was evidenced by lower maximum stress, lower maximum strain and displacement.
Conclusion
The minimally invasive approach combined with an anatomical locking plate for scapular body fractures had better biomechanical stability. The study provided a biomechanical basis to guide the clinical treatment of scapular body fractures.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Moverman MA, Menendez ME, Mahendraraj KA, Polisetty T, Jawa A, Levy JC. Patient risk factors for acromial stress fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a multicenter study. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2021;30:1619–25.
2. Pires RE, Giordano V, de Souza F, Labronici PJ. Current challenges and controversies in the management of scapular fractures: a review. Patient Saf Surg. 2021;15:6.
3. Cole PA, Freeman G, Dubin JR. Scapula fractures. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013;6:79–87.
4. Daher M, Farraj SA, El Hassan B. Management of extra-articular Scapular fractures: a narrative review and proposal of a treatment algorithm. Clin Orthop Surg. 2023;15:695–703.
5. Tadros AM, Lunsjo K, Czechowski J, Abu-Zidan FM. Multiple-region scapular fractures had more severe chest injury than single-region fractures: a prospective study of 107 blunt trauma patients. J Trauma. 2007;63:889–93.