Author:
Sudjai Narumol,Siriwanarangsun Palanan,Lektrakul Nittaya,Saiviroonporn Pairash,Maungsomboon Sorranart,Phimolsarnti Rapin,Asavamongkolkul Apichat,Chandhanayingyong Chandhanarat
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To develop a machine learning model based on tumor-to-bone distance and radiomic features derived from preoperative MRI images to distinguish intramuscular (IM) lipomas and atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcomas (ALTs/WDLSs) and compared with radiologists.
Methods
The study included patients with IM lipomas and ALTs/WDLSs diagnosed between 2010 and 2022, and with MRI scans (sequence/field strength: T1-weighted (T1W) imaging at 1.5 or 3.0 Tesla MRI). Manual segmentation of tumors based on the three-dimensional T1W images was performed by two observers to appraise the intra- and interobserver variability. After radiomic features and tumor-to-bone distance were extracted, it was used to train a machine learning model to distinguish IM lipomas and ALTs/WDLSs. Both feature selection and classification steps were performed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator logistic regression. The performance of the classification model was assessed using a tenfold cross-validation strategy and subsequently evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. The classification agreement of two experienced musculoskeletal (MSK) radiologists was assessed using the kappa statistics. The diagnosis accuracy of each radiologist was evaluated using the final pathological results as the gold standard. Additionally, we compared the performance of the model and two radiologists in terms of the area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUCs) using the Delong’s test.
Results
There were 68 tumors (38 IM lipomas and 30 ALTs/WDLSs). The AUC of the machine learning model was 0.88 [95% CI 0.72–1] (sensitivity, 91.6%; specificity, 85.7%; and accuracy, 89.0%). For Radiologist 1, the AUC was 0.94 [95% CI 0.87–1] (sensitivity, 97.4%; specificity, 90.9%; and accuracy, 95.0%), and as to Radiologist 2, the AUC was 0.91 [95% CI 0.83–0.99] (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 81.8%; and accuracy, 93.3%). The classification agreement of the radiologists was 0.89 of kappa value (95% CI 0.76–1). Although the AUC of the model was lower than of two experienced MSK radiologists, there was no statistically significant difference between the model and two radiologists (all P > 0.05).
Conclusions
The novel machine learning model based on tumor-to-bone distance and radiomic features is a noninvasive procedure that has the potential for distinguishing IM lipomas from ALTs/WDLSs. The predictive features that suggested malignancy were size, shape, depth, texture, histogram, and tumor-to-bone distance.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery
Reference51 articles.
1. McTighe S, Chernev I. Intramuscular lipoma: a review of the literature. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2014;6(4):5618.
2. Ramos-Pascua LR, Guerra-Álvarez OA, Sánchez-Herráez S, Izquierdo-García FM, Maderuelo-Fernández J. Intramuscular lipomas: Large and deep benign lumps not to underestimated. Review of a series of 51 cases. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2013;57(6):391–7.
3. Su CH, Hung JK, Chang IL. Surgical treatment of intramuscular, infiltrating lipoma. Int Surg. 2011;96(1):56–9.
4. Sbaraglia M, Dei Tos, A P Pedeutour F. Atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma. In: The WHO classification of tumours editorial board, editor. Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. WHO Classification of Tumours. 3. 5th ed. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2020. p. 36–8.
5. Johnson CN, Ha AS, Chen E, Davidson D. Lipomatous soft-tissue tumors. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26(22):779–88.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献