Author:
Yang Rui-Feng,Huang Shu-Ming,Wu Quan-Zhou,Ye Fang,Lan Shu-Hua
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to examine the prevalence and clinical findings of the vacuum phenomenon (VP) in closed pelvic fractures.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 352 patients with closed pelvic fractures who presented to our institution from January 2017 to December 2020. Pelvic fractures were diagnosed by plain radiography and computed tomography (CT). The default “bone window” was used for inspection in the cross section. Electronic medical records were consulted by two orthopedic physicians to obtain patient information. The VP of pelvic fracture, fracture classification, injury mechanism, and image data were evaluated, and the demographic parameter data were statistically analyzed. The follow-up time was 12–18 months.
Results
Among them, 169 were males and 183 were females with ages ranging from 3 to 100 years, with an average of 49.6 ± 19.3 years. VP in pelvic fractures was detected by CT in 109 (31%) of the 352 patients with pelvic fractures. Patients were divided into the high-energy trauma group (278 cases) and fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) group (74 cases) according to the injury mechanism. In the high-energy trauma group, 227 cases were treated surgically and 201 cases had bony healing. The healing time was 9.8 ± 5.3 weeks. In the FFP group, 54 cases were treated surgically and 49 cases had bone healing. The healing time was 9.3 ± 3.8 weeks. Fractures progressed in nine patients. VP was mostly located in the sacroiliac joint in our study.
Conclusions
The incidence of VP in pelvic fractures is statistically high and is affected by many factors, such as examination technique, joint position, population composition, etc. Therefore, the VP is not a reliable sign of pelvic injury. Clinically, we need to determine the nature of VP in conjunction with gas patterns, laboratory tests, history, and physical examination.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery
Reference28 articles.
1. Gohil I, Vilensky JA, Weber EC. Vacuum phenomenon: Clinical relevance. Clin Anat. 2014;27:455–62.
2. Yanagawa Y, Ohsaka H, Jitsuiki K, et al. Vacuum phenomenon. Emerg Radiol. 2016;23:377–82.
3. Jerre T. The vacuum phenomenon in the hip joint. Acta Orthop Scand. 1948;17:211–23.
4. Liu Z, Yan W, Zhang L. Analysis of the vacuum phenomenon in plain hip radiographs in children. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:3325–31.
5. Lee TH, Wapner KL, Mayer DP, Hecht PJ. Computed tomographic demonstration of the vacuum phenomenon in the subtalar and tibiotalar joints. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:382–5.