Author:
Liu Songyang,Liu Shen,Gu Feng,Wei Xing,Liang Yonghui
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The most recommended method for treating transverse patella fractures is modified tension band wiring (MTBW). However, the optimal instrument for use with MTBW is still undetermined. Hence, we aimed to design a novel screw-cable integrated system (SCIS) and compare its biomechanical characteristics with Kirschner-wire, SCIS, and Cable-Pin systems in treating transverse patellar fracture.
Methods
A finite-element (FE) model of transverse patella fracture was created. The fracture model was fixed with either K-wire, SCIS, or Cable-pin. Different tension force loading (400 N and 800 N), direction(0° and 45°), and screw or K-wire depth(5 mm and 10 mm) were set. The maximum displacement of the fragment and maximum gap opening were measured by using FE analysis.
Results
Compared with the K-wire and Cable-pin system, SCIS increased the stability of the fractured patella by reducing fragment displacement and gap opening. Under 400 N loading in the direction 45°, SCIS with screw placing at 5-mm depth reduced the maximum fragment displacement (0.43 mm) by 49.62% and 26%, respectively, compared with the K-wire (0.22 mm) and Cable-pin (0. 22 mm) group. Meanwhile, the gap opening in SCIS (0.05 mm) was reduced by 83% and 59.8% (0.05 to 0.18) compared with the K-wire (0.30 mm) and Cable-pin (0.18 mm) group.
Conclusion
SCIS demonstrated improved biomechanical stability for treating transverse patellar fractures compared to MTBW with Kirschner wire and the Cable-Pin system. Finite element analysis showed SCIS substantially reduced fracture fragment displacement and gap opening under various loading conditions.
Funder
Aerospace Center Hospital Foundation
Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission, Adminitrative Commission of Zhongguancun Science Park
Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery
Reference30 articles.
1. Lv H, Chen W, Zhang T, Hou Z, Yang G, Zhu Y, Wang H, Yin B, Guo J, Liu L, Hu P, Liu S, Liu B, Sun J, Li S, Zhang X, Li Y, Zhang Y. Traumatic fractures in China from 2012 to 2014: a national survey of 512,187 individuals. Osteoporos Int. 2020;31:2167–78.
2. Carpenter JE, Kasman R, Matthews LS. Fractures of the patella. Instr Course Lect. 1994;43:97–108.
3. Bostman O, Kiviluoto O, Santavirta S, Nirhamo J, Wilppula E. Fractures of the patella treated by operation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1978;1983(102):78–81.
4. Bostrom A. Fracture of the patella. A study of 422 patellar fractures. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1972;143:1–80.
5. Ma XY, Liu B, Zhou DP, Xiang LB. Treatment for transverse patella fractures with minimally invasive techniques. Exp Ther Med. 2022;23:192.