Author:
Sun Zhongye,Li Hao,Wang Bei,Yan Jun,Han Liren,Han Shizhang,Yang Xiaofei,Zhao Bei
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Fractures of the base of the coracoid process are relatively rare, but an increasing number of studies have reported using screws to fix coracoid process base fractures. This study was performed to simulate the surgical procedure and obtain the ideal diameter, length, insertion point and angle of the screw from a 3-D axial perspective in Chinese patients.
Methods
We randomly collected right scapula computed tomography (CT) scans from 100 adults. DICOM-formatted CT scan images were imported into Mimics software. A 3D digital model of the right scapula was established. Two virtual cylinders representing two screws were placed from the top of the coracoid process to the neck of the scapula and across the base of the coracoid process to fix the base of the coracoid process. The largest secure diameters and lengths of the virtual screws were measured. The positions of the insertion points and the directions of the screws were also examined.
Results
The screw insertion safe zone can exhibit an irregular fusiform shape according to the reconstructed scapula model. The mean maximum diameters of the medial and lateral screws were 7.08 ± 1.19 mm and 7.34 ± 1.11 mm, respectively. The mean maximum lengths of the medial and lateral screws were 43.11 ± 6.31 mm and 48.16 ± 6.94 mm, respectively. A screw insertion corridor with a diameter of at least 4.5 mm was found in all patients. We found sex-dependent differences in the mean maximum diameters and maximum lengths of the two screws. The positions of the two insertion points were statistically different across sexes.
Conclusions
The study provides a valuable guideline for determining the largest secure corridor for two screws in fixing a fracture at the base of the coracoid process. For ideal screw placement, we suggest individualised preoperative 3D reconstruction simulations. Further biomechanical studies are needed to verify the function of the screws.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery
Reference32 articles.
1. Galvin JW, Kang J, Ma R, et al. Fractures of the coracoid process: evaluation, management, and outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28:e706-15.
2. Ogawa K, Yoshida A, Takahashi M, et al. Fractures of the coracoid process. J Bone Joint Surg. 1997;79:17–9.
3. Li CH, Skalski MR, Matcuk GR Jr, et al. Coracoid process fractures: anatomy, injury patterns, multimodality imaging, and approach to management. Emerg Radiol. 2019;26:449–58.
4. Wei Z, Bingzhe H, Jingjing Y, et al. Fractured coracoid process with acromioclavicular joint dislocation -a case report. Medicine. 2020;99:39.
5. Duan X, Zhang H, Zhang H, et al. Treatment of coracoid process fractures associated with acromioclavicular dislocation using clavicular hook plate and coracoid screws. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(2):e22–5.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献