Author:
Qian Xiaoli,Cao Xiaodong,Zhu Liyan,Yao Xiaojuan,Gu Lina,Yu Xin
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To observe the effect of the whole-process care model of the medical union on the improvement of kinesiophobia and bone mineral density in patients with osteoporosis.
Methods
In this descriptive study, a convenient sampling method was used to select 148 patients with osteoporosis who visited the hospital from January 2020 to December 2021. Patients aged ≥ 18 years and diagnosed with osteoporosis through quantitative computed tomography (QCT) were included in the study. They were able to cooperate during follow-up and had normal cognitive function. Patients with combined spinal curvature, thoracic deformity, and pulmonary dysfunction, accompanied by severe cardiovascular or limb dysfunction, and those who withdrew midway or participated in other clinical studies were excluded. According to whether to use the whole-process care model of the medical union, they were divided into intervention group and control group, with 74 cases each. The control group used conventional care, and the intervention group used the whole-process care model of the medical association. The occurrence of kinesiophobia between the two groups were compared. The dual-energy X-ray absorption detector is used to measure differences in bone density changes.
Results
There was no significant difference between the two groups in the TSK scale score and the incidence of kinesiophobia before intervention (P > 0.05). The TSK scale scores of patients in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group at 3 months and 6 months after operation (P < 0.05). The incidence of kinesiophobia in the intervention group for 3 months and 6 months was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in bone mineral density between the two groups before and 3 months after intervention (P > 0.05). The bone mineral density of lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group after 6 months of intervention (P < 0.05).
Conclusion
The whole-process care model of the medical association is used for osteoporosis patients, which might reduce the risk of kinesiophobia and improve the bone density of the lumbar spine and total hip in patients. But further promotion and improvement of relevant support systems are needed to achieve comprehensive promotion and maximize clinical benefits in this field.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Zheng M, Wan Y, Liu G, et al. Differences in the prevalence and risk factors of osteoporosis in chinese urban and rural regions: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24(1):46.
2. Chandran M, Brind’Amour K, Fujiwara S, et al. Prevalence of osteoporosis and incidence of related fractures in developed economies in the Asia Pacific region: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int. 2023;34(6):1037–53.
3. Gunendi Z, Eker D, Tecer D, et al. Is the word “osteoporosis” a reason for kinesiophobia? Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;54(5):671–5.
4. Wu HYFS, Liu HZ, et al. Analysis of influencing factors of postoperative kinesiophobia in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Med Innov China. 2023;20(9):147–51.
5. Cheng XGWL, Zeng Q, et al. The China guideline for the diagnosis criteria of osteoporosis with quantitative computed tomography (QCT)(2018). Chin J Osteoporos. 2019;25(6):733–7.