Abstract
Abstract
Background
Longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) ecosystems are recognized as biodiversity hotspots, and their sustainability is tightly coupled to a complex nexus of feedbacks between fire, composition, and structure. While previous research has demonstrated that frequent fire is often associated with higher levels of biodiversity, relationships between fire frequency and forest structure are more nuanced because structure can be difficult to measure and characterize. We expanded on this body of research by using lidar to characterize vegetation structure in response to fire frequency at a long-term prescribed-fire experiment. We asked (1) how does prescribed fire frequency affect structure and (2) how do structural metrics vary in the strength of their relationships with fire frequency.
Results
Our results indicated that forest structure varied significantly in response to fire frequency, with more frequent fire reducing vegetation structural complexity. Metrics that characterized the central tendency of vegetation and/or the variance of canopy-related properties were weakly to moderately correlated with prescribed fire frequency, while metrics that captured the vertical dispersion or variability of vegetation throughout the forest strata were moderately to strongly correlated with fire frequency. Of all the metrics evaluated, the understory complexity index had the strongest correlation with fire frequency and explained 88% of the structural variation in response to prescribed fire treatments.
Conclusions
The findings presented in this study highlight the usefulness of lidar technology for characterizing forest structure and that structural complexity cannot be fully characterized by a single metric. Instead, a range of diverse metrics is required to refine scientific understanding of the feedbacks between fire, composition, and structure in support of longleaf pine sustainability. Furthermore, there is a need for further research to broaden structural assessments beyond the overstory and incorporate more understory components, particularly within the realm of prescribed fire science and land management.
Funder
Joint Fire Science Program
Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program
Environmental Security Technology Certification Program
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference64 articles.
1. Almeida, D. R. A., S. C. Stark, and R. Chazdon et al. 2019. The effectiveness of lidar remote sensing for monitoring forest cover attributes and landscape restoration. Forest Ecology and Management 438: 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.02.002.
2. Atchley, A. L., R. Linn, and A. Jonko et al. 2021. Effects of fuel spatial distribution on wildland fire behaviour. Int J Wildland Fire 30: 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF20096.
3. Atkins, J. W., G. Bohrer, and R. T. Fahey et al. 2018. Quantifying vegetation and canopy structural complexity from terrestrial LiDAR data using the forestr r package. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9: 2057–2066. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13061.
4. Bigelow, S., M. C. Stambaugh, and J. J. O’Brien et al. 2018. Longleaf pine restoration in context comparisons of frequent fire forests, Ecological restoration and management of longleaf pine forests eds. L. Katherine Kirkman, B. Steven, and Jack. vol. 2018 311–338. Taylor & Francis Group: CRC.
5. Buján, S., J. Guerra-Hernández, E. González-Ferreiro, and D. Miranda. 2021. Forest road detection using LiDAR data and hybrid classification. Remote Sensing 13: 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030393.