Abstract
Abstract
Background
Wildfire management is increasingly shifting from firefighting to wildfire prevention aiming at disaster risk reduction. This implies fuel and landscape management and engagement with stakeholders. This transition is comparable to the history of water management in the Netherlands, which shifted from fighting against water to flood risk reduction and living with water. Here, we draw lessons from water management for integrated fire management that are useful for society, agencies, and government. To this end, we review the literature on integrated and adaptive water management in the Netherlands.
Results
Based on the results, we argue that (1) a holistic and integrated approach, (2) adaptive management, and (3) resilient landscapes through stakeholder participation are necessary to improve the resilience against and prevention of wildfires within integrated fire management.
Conclusion
To make society more resilient to wildfires and shift to a greater focus on prevention within disaster risk reduction, there is a need to take a more long-term perspective and include a wider range of stakeholders to develop new wildfire policies. Integrated fire management should facilitate and promote community initiatives to implement fire risk reduction measures in different landscapes and the wildland urban interface (WUI) including the use of nature-based solutions. Inspired by the successes in Dutch water management, fire management needs greater participation of stakeholders and collaboration between stakeholders to share responsibility and knowledge to make wildfire prevention more attractive and implementable by society, landowners, civil protection, and policymakers.
Funder
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Environmental Science (miscellaneous),Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Forestry
Reference97 articles.
1. Abbott, G., and M. Chapman. 2018. Addressing the new normal: 21st century disaster management in British Columbia. In Independent report for government and British Columbians. Victoria: BC Government.
2. AGIF. (2020). Plano Nacional de Gestão Integrada de Fogos Rurais.
3. Ahmed, M.R., K.R. Rahaman, and Q.K. Hassan. 2018. Remote sensing of wildland fire-induced risk assessment at the community level. Sensors 18 (5): 1570 https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/5/1570.
4. Badia, A., M. Pallares-Barbera, N. Valldeperas, and M. Gisbert. 2019. Wildfires in the wildland-urban interface in Catalonia: vulnerability analysis based on land use and land cover change. Science of the Total Environment 673: 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.012.
5. Bilbao, B., J. Mistry, A. Millán, and A. Berardi. 2019. Sharing multiple perspectives on burning: towards a participatory and intercultural fire management policy in Venezuela, Brazil, and Guyana. Fire 2 (3): 39.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献