Abstract
Abstract
Background
Shortleaf pine is a fire-adapted tree species, and prescribed fire is commonly used to increase its regeneration success, improve wildlife habitat, and reach conservation objectives associated with open forest ecosystems. We studied direct effects of heat and smoke on shortleaf pine germination in a greenhouse study and effects of season of burning on the number of new germinants in a field study. Improved understanding of fire effects on shortleaf pine seed and regeneration success can help refine burn prescriptions to better meet specific management objectives.
Results
Temperatures ≥ 120 °C eliminated germination of shortleaf pine seeds in a greenhouse trial, and exposure of seeds to 60 °C resulted in no reduction in germination compared to the unheated control regardless of duration of exposure. At 80 °C, duration of heat exposure mattered, with exposure for 10 min reducing germination compared to unheated controls. Smoke exposure had no effect on germination. A field experiment showed that fall burns (prior to seedfall) resulted in greater initial germinant counts than early spring burns (after seedfall but before germination) or unburned controls, which both resulted in greater initial germinant counts than late spring burns (after germination).
Conclusions
Season of prescribed burning can affect the success of shortleaf pine germination. Late spring burning resulted in high mortality of young germinants. Burning in early spring likely resulted in direct damage to some seeds due to heating but may have also had indirect benefit by exposing mineral soil. Fall burning, before the dispersal of shortleaf pine seed, yielded the highest germinant count and is recommended if improving natural regeneration from seed is the primary objective.
Funder
Northern Research Station
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Environmental Science (miscellaneous),Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Forestry
Reference60 articles.
1. Anderson, McRee, Lark Hayes, Patrick D. Keyser, Christopher M. Lituma, Robert D. Sutter, and Doug Zollner. 2016. Shortleaf pine restoration plan: Restoring an American forest legacy. Shortleaf Pine Initiative.
2. Arthur, Mary A., Heather D. Alexander, Daniel C. Dey, Callie J. Schweitzer, and David L. Loftis. 2012. Refining the oak-fire hypothesis for management of oak-dominated forests of the eastern United States. Journal of Forestry 110 (5): 257–266.
3. Baker, James B. Natural regeneration of shortleaf pine. In Proc. Shortleaf Pine Regeneration Workshop. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-90; 1992. pp. 102–112.
4. Batek, Michael J., Alan J. Rebertus, Walter A. Schroeder, Timothy L. Haithcoat, Eric Compas, and Richard P. Guyette. 1999. Reconstruction of early nineteenth-century vegetation and fire regimes in the Missouri Ozarks. Journal of Biogeography 26 (2): 397–412.
5. Baxter, B.J.M., J.E. Granger, and J. Van Staden. 1995. Plant-derived smoke and seed germination: Is all smoke good smoke? That is the burning question. South African Journal of Botany 61 (5): 275–277.