Participatory agenda setting as a process — of people, ambassadors and translation: a case study of participatory agenda setting in rural areas

Author:

Schroth FabianORCID,Glatte Hannah,Kaiser Simone,Heidingsfelder Marie

Abstract

AbstractThis paper presents a case study of a participatory agenda setting process in rural areas, with the aim of establishing at which points participation was achieved and via which channels and processes the results of said participation were introduced into local and overarching policy agendas. We argue that participatory agenda setting involves two central challenges, namely the development of dialogue formats and procedures that enable members of the public to take part in the process, and the selection and use of the appropriate channels for conveying their input to the relevant decision-makers. Agenda setting is thus a process during which concepts and issues are collaboratively uncovered or developed and then integrated, via networks, into policy and research strategy. Accordingly, this process encompasses the actors involved in the agenda setting process, the procedures that make participation possible, and the channels via which the results are then transferred.

Funder

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Sociology and Political Science

Reference39 articles.

1. Aaron R, Niklas G, Philine W (2018) But do they deliver? Participatory agenda setting on the test bed. Eur J Futures Res 6(14):1–12

2. Blackwell AF, Lee W, Street A, Boulton C, and Knell J. 2009. Radical Innovation: Crossing Knowledge Boundaries with Interdisciplinary Teams. http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/techreports/UCAM-CL-TR-760.pdf.

3. Callon M (1986) The sociology of an actor-network. In: Callon M, Law J, Rip A (eds) Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. MacMillan, Basingstoke, pp 19–34

4. Callon M (2009) Civilizing markets: carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments. Acc Organ Soc 34:535–548

5. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (2009) ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. Int J Technol Manag 46:201–234 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3