Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Closed loop total intravenous anesthesia is a technique in which the patient’s hemodynamic and anesthetic depth variables are monitored, and based on this information, a computer controls the infusion rate of drugs to keep them within pre-established clinical parameters.
Objective
To describe the technical and clinical performance of a closed loop system for total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil, using the SEDLineTM monitor
Design
Multicentric prospective cohort study
Setting
Surgery room
Patients
ASA I-II undergoing elective surgery
Measurements
The authors designed a closed loop system that implements a control algorithm based on anesthetic depth monitoring and the Patient State Index (PSITM) of the SEDLine monitor for propofol, and on hemodynamic variables for remifentanil. The measurement of clinical performance was made based on the percentage of PSITM maintenance time in the range 20–50. Precision analysis was evaluated by measuring median performance error (MDPE) can be defined as the median difference between actual and desired values, which refers to the degree of precision in which the controller is able to maintain the control variable within the objective set by the anesthesiologist; it represents the direction (over-prediction or under-prediction) of performance error (PE) rather than size of errors, which is represented by MDAPE, median absolute percentage error, Wobble index, which is used for measuring the intrasubject variability in performance error.
Results
Data were obtained from 93 patients in three healthcare centers. The percentage of PSITM maintenance time in the 20–50 range was 92% (80.7–97.0). MDPE was 10.7 (− 11.0–18.0), MDAPE 21.0 (14.2–26.8) and wobble 10.7 (7.0–16.9). No adverse surgical or anesthetic events were found.
Conclusions
The closed loop total intravenous anesthesia system with SEDLine developed by the authors was used without major complication and appear to be feasible its use in clinical performance.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Absalom AR, Mani V, De Smet T, Struys MMRF. Pharmacokinetic models for propofol--defining and illuminating the devil in the detail. 2009;103(1):26–37 Available from: https://academic.oup.com/bja/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/bja/aep143.
2. Barvais L, Lobo FA, Engbers FH, Irwin MG, Schnider TW, Schraag S. Tips and tricks to optimize total intravenous anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2013;64(6):137–46 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24605414.
3. Casas F, et al. Evaluación de un sistema en lazo cerrado con el índice Biespectral para la administración de anestesia total intravenosa: Serie de Casos Prospectiva. Trabajo de grado: Universidad de Antioquia; 2015.
4. Casas FD, Fernandez JM. Evaluation of a closed loop total intravenous anesthesia system with BIS compared to an open loop target controlled infusion system (TCI): Randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2016;123(3):766–7 Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00000539-201609002-00575.
5. Chen X, Tang J, White PF, Wender RH, Ma H, Sloninsky A, et al. A comparison of patient state index and bispectral index values during the perioperative period. Anesth Analg. 2002;95(6):1669–74 table of contents.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献