Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
United Nations (UN) agencies are influential global health actors that can introduce legal instruments to call on Member States to act on pressing issues. This paper examines the deployment and strength of global health law instruments used by UN actors to call on Member States to restrict the exposure of children to unhealthy food and beverage marketing.
Methods
Global health law instruments were identified from a review of four UN agencies that have a mandate over children’s exposure to marketing of unhealthy food and beverage products namely: the World Health Organization (WHO); the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO); the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) and the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). Data on marketing restrictions were extracted and coded and descriptive qualitative content analysis was used to assess the strength of the instruments.
Results
A wide range of instruments have been used by the four agencies: seven by the WHO; two by the FAO; three by the UNGA; and eight by the UN human rights infrastructure. The UN human rights instruments used strong, consistent language and called for government regulations to be enacted in a directive manner. In contrast, the language calling for action by the WHO, FAO and UNGA was weaker, inconsistent, did not get stronger over time and varied according to the type of instrument used.
Conclusion
This study suggests that a child rights-based approach to restricting unhealthy food and beverage marketing to children would be supported by strong human rights legal instruments and would allow for more directive recommendations to Member States than is currently provided by WHO, FAO and UNGA. Strengthening the directives in the instruments to clarify Member States’ obligations using both WHO and child rights mandates would increase the utility of global health law and UN actors’ influence.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference70 articles.
1. Boyland EJ, Nolan S, Kelly B, Tudur-Smith C, Jones A, Halford JCG et al. Advertising as a cue to consume: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of acute exposure to unhealthy food and nonalcoholic beverage advertising on intake in children and adults. Am J Clin Nutr [Internet]. 2016 Feb 1 [cited 2022 Jun 20];103(2):519–33. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26791177/.
2. Smith R, Kelly B, Yeatman H, Boyland E. Food marketing influences children’s attitudes, preferences and consumption: A systematic critical review. Nutrients [Internet]. 2019 Apr 1 [cited 2022 Jun 20];11(4). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31003489/.
3. Russell SJ, Croker H, Viner RM. The effect of screen advertising on children’s dietary intake: A systematic review and meta-analysis [Internet]. Vol. 20, Obesity Reviews. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2019 [cited 2020 Feb 22]. p. 554–68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12812.
4. Cairns G, Angus K, Hastings G, Caraher M. Systematic reviews of the evidence on the nature, extent and effects of food marketing to children. A retrospective summary. Appetite [Internet]. 2013 Mar 1 [cited 2020 Feb 13];62:209–15. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22561190.
5. Hastings G, Stead M, Mcdermott L, Forsyth A, Mackintosh AM, Rayner M et al. Review of research on the effects of food promotion to children Final Report Prepared for the Food Standards Agency [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2020 Feb 22]. Available from: http://www.csm.strath.ac.uk.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献