Abstract
Abstract
Context
Corporate engagement with food and beverage companies who produce food associated with health harms is a divisive topic in the global nutrition community, with high-profile cases of conflict of interest increasingly coming under scrutiny. There is a need for an agreed method to support health organizations in deciding whether and how to engage with large food and beverage manufacturers.
Aim
The aim of this study was to develop a method to quantify the proportion of sales from food and beverage companies that are derived from unhealthy foods to support organizations in determining which companies might be considered high-risk for engagement.
Methods
The 2015 WHO Euro nutrient profile model was applied to 35,550 products from 1294 brands manufactured by the top 20 global food and beverage companies from seven countries (Australia, Brazil, China, India, South Africa, UK and USA). For the purpose of this study, products that met the WHO Euro criteria were classified as “healthier” and those that failed were classified as “unhealthy”. Products were grouped by brand and weighted by the brand’s value sales for 2020. The primary outcome was the proportion of each company’s sales that were classified as unhealthy and healthier by company and category.
Results
Overall, 89% of the top 20 companies’ brand sales were classified as unhealthy. For every USD$10 spent on the top 20 companies’ brands, only $1.10 was spent on products considered healthier. All companies saw the majority of their sales come from unhealthy foods, including soft drinks, confectionery and snacks. None of Red Bull or Ferrero’s sales were classified as healthier and less than 5% of total sales were healthier for Mondelēz, Mars, and PepsiCo. Some companies had higher proportions of sales deriving from healthier products, including Grupo Bimbo (48%), Danone (34%) and Conagra (32%), although the majority of their sales were still derived from unhealthy foods.
Discussion
The results presented in this study highlight the reliance the leading food and beverage companies have on sales of unhealthy products that are contributing to diet-related disease globally. The method and steps we have laid out here could be used by organizations in the global health community to identify companies that have conflicts of interest when it comes to engaging with governments, international organizations and public health bodies on issues of policy and regulation.
Funder
UNICEF
National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration Oxford and Thames Valley
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference39 articles.
1. United Nations. Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015 A/RES/70/1.
2. FAO, Ifad, UNICEF, WFP, WHO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World. Repurposing food and agricultural policies to make healthy diets more affordable. Rome: FAO; 2022.
3. World Obesity. Prevalence of Obesity 2022. Available from: https://www.worldobesity.org/about/about-obesity/prevalence-of-obesity.
4. World Health Organization. WHO issues guidance on emerging double threat of childhood obesity and undernutrition in low- and middle-income countries 2013 . Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/05-06-2013-who-issues-guidance-on-emerging-double-threat-of-childhood-obesity-and-undernutrition-in-low--and-middle-income-countries. Cited 2023 23.02.23.
5. Augustin MA, Riley M, Stockmann R, Bennett L, Kahl A, Lockett T, et al. Role of food processing in food and nutrition security. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2016;56:115–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2016.08.005.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献