Abstract
Abstract
Background
COVID-19 pandemic provides a unique opportunity to learn the challenges encountered by public health emergency preparedness systems, both in terms of problems encountered and adaptations during and after the first wave, as well as successful responses to them.
Results
This work draws on published literature, interviews with countries and institutional documents as part of a European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control project that aims to identify the implications for preparedness measurement derived from COVID-19 pandemic experience in order to advance future preparedness efforts in European Union member states. The analysis focused on testing and surveillance themes and five countries were considered, namely Italy, Germany, Finland, Spain and Croatia. Our analysis shown that a country’s ability to conduct testing at scale was critical, especially early in the pandemic, and the inability to scale up testing operations created critical issues for public health operations such as contact tracing. Countries were required to develop new strategies, approaches, and policies under pressure and to review and revise them as the pandemic evolved, also considering that public health systems operate at the national, regional, and local level with respect to testing, contact tracing, and surveillance, and involve both government agencies as well as private organizations. Therefore, communication among multiple public and private entities at all levels and coordination of the testing and surveillance activities was critical.
Conclusion
With regard to testing and surveillance, three capabilities that were essential to the COVID-19 response in the first phase, and presumably in other public health emergencies: the ability to scale-up testing, contact tracing, surveillance efforts; flexibility to develop new strategies, approaches, and policies under pressure and to review and revise them as the pandemic evolved; and the ability to coordinate and communicate in complex public health systems that operate at the national, regional, and local level with respect and involve multiple government agencies as well as private organizations.
Funder
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference35 articles.
1. COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science. and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU). Updated 5 October 2022. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html.
2. Council of the European Union, Provisional agreement on new EU law on serious cross-border threats to health. 23. June 2022. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/06/23/provisional-agreement-on-new-eu-law-on-serious-cross-border-threats-to-health/.
3. Savoia E, Piltch-Loeb R, Masterson E, Testa MA, Fantini MP, Tsolova S. Rapid Analysis of the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic Response for the Development of Preparedness Measures for Public Communication, 29 July 2022. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4174475.
4. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. The EU experience in the first phase of COVID-19: Implication for measuring preparedness. Stockholm: ECDC; 2022. Available at: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/eu-experience-first-phase-covid-19-implications-measuring-preparedness.
5. Piltch-Loeb R, Kraemer JD, Stoto MA. A Public Health Emergency preparedness critical incident Registry. Biosecur Bioterror. 2014;12(3):132–43.