Abstract
AbstractAddressing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) through the pandemic treaty is a crucial aspect of pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. At the moment, AMR-related provisions in the draft text do not go far enough and will likely lead countries to commit to the status-quo of AMR action. We suggest that the protocol mechanism of the treaty proposed under Article 31 offers an opportunity to develop a subsidiary agreement (or protocol) to further codify the specific obligations and enforcement mechanisms necessary to meet the treaty’s AMR provisions. We also highlight experiences with previous treaty implementation that relied on protocols to inform design of a future AMR protocol.
Funder
Wellcome Trust
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Weldon I, Hoffman SJ. Fit for purpose? Assessing the ecological fit of the Social Institutions that globally govern Antimicrobial Resistance. Perspect Polit 2024;: 1–22.
2. Ruckert A, Gonçalo das Neves C, Amuasi J et al. One health as a Pillar for a transformative Pandemic Treaty. 2021. https://www.graduateinstitute.ch/sites/internet/files/2021-11/policybrief-onehealth-v3.pdf.
3. Munkholm L, Katwyk SRV. International Law and Antimicrobial Resistance: learning from Fifteen Years implementing the International Health regulations. In: Rubin O, Baekkeskov E, Munkholm L, editors. Steering against Superbugs. 1st ed. Oxford University PressOxford; 2023. pp. 267–80.
4. Lake SJ, Katwyk SRV, Hoffman SJ. Antimicrobial Resistance must be included in the pandemic instrument to ensure Future Global Pandemic Readiness. J Law Med Ethics. 2022;50:9–16.
5. Draft Negotiating. Text of the WHO convention, agreement or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response (WHO Pandemic Agreement). 2023.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献