Abstract
Abstract
Background
A central goal of rehabilitation in patients with paralysis syndromes after stroke or spinal cord injury (SCI) is to restore independent mobility as a pedestrian or wheelchair user. However, after acute rehabilitation, the mobility frequently deteriorates in the ambulatory setting, despite the delivery of rehabilitative interventions such as physical therapy or the prescription of assistive devices. The aim of the NeuroMoves study is to identify factors that are associated with changes of mobility in the ambulatory setting after acute inpatient rehabilitation, with a particular focus on participation according to the ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health).
Methods
The NeuroMoves study is intended as a national multicenter observational cohort study with 9 clinical sites in Germany. A total of 500 patients with mobility-restricting paralysis syndromes (i.e. stroke or SCI) are to be recruited during acute inpatient rehabilitation prior to discharge to the ambulatory setting. Patients will have 8 months of follow-up in the ambulatory setting. Three study visits at the clinical sites (baseline, midterm, and final) are planned at 4-months intervals. The baseline visit is scheduled at the end of the acute inpatient rehabilitation. During the visits, demographical data, neurological, functional, quality of life, and implementation measures will be assessed.
At baseline, each study participant receives an activity tracker (sensor for recording ambulatory mobility) along with a tablet computer for home use over the 8 months study duration. While mounted, the activity tracker records mobility data from which the daily distance covered by walking or wheelchair use can be calculated. Customized applications on the tablet computer remind the study participants to answer structured questionnaires about their health condition and treatment goals for physical therapy. Using the study participants’ tablet, therapists will be asked to answer structured questionnaires concerning treatment goals and therapeutic measures they have applied. The primary analysis concerns the association between mobility (daily distance covered) and the degree of participation-oriented rehab interventions. Further exploratory analyses are planned.
Discussion
The findings could inform healthcare decision-making regarding ambulatory care in Germany focusing on mobility-promoting interventions for patients with mobility-restricting paralysis syndromes.
Study registration
German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS-ID: DRKS00020487 (18.02.2020).
Funder
Innovationsfonds-Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss Deutschland
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Neurology (clinical),General Medicine
Reference33 articles.
1. Behrens J, Busch I, Grand HJ, Heidt S, Breuer C, Glaesener J, et al. Zur Bedeutung der Heilmittel für die Förderung der Teilhabe unter Berücksichtigung des Auftrags therapeutischer Fachberufe – ein Beitrag zur aktuellen Diskussion. 2016. Available from: https://www.dvfr.de/fileadmin/user_upload/DVfR/Downloads/Stellungnahmen/Heilmittel-Ausschuss_Expertise.pdf.
2. Silva SM, Correa FI, Faria CD, Buchalla CM, Silva PF, Correa JC. Evaluation of post-stroke functionality based on the international classification of functioning, disability, and health: a proposal for use of assessment tools. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(6):1665–70. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.1665.
3. Steiner WA, Ryser L, Huber E, Uebelhart D, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G. Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Ther. 2002;82(11):1098–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/82.11.1098.
4. Stähler T, Krenz S, Backes I. Empfehlungen für die phase E der neurologischen rehabilitation. 2013. Available from: https://www.bar-frankfurt.de/fileadmin/dateiliste/_publikationen/reha_vereinbarungen/pdfs/BAREmpfPhaseE7.1.web.pdf.
5. Meyer S, Verheyden G, Brinkmann N, Dejaeger E, De Weerdt W, Feys H, et al. Functional and motor outcome 5 years after stroke is equivalent to outcome at 2 months: follow-up of the collaborative evaluation of rehabilitation in stroke across Europe. Stroke. 2015;46(6):1613–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009421.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献