Author:
Bjelica Bogdan,Wohnrade Camilla,Cespedes Iraima,Osmanovic Alma,Schreiber-Katz Olivia,Petri Susanne
Abstract
Abstract
Background
We aimed to describe the experience of a single neuromuscular center in Germany in treating adult spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) patients with risdiplam and to analyze motor function and treatment satisfaction during a follow-up period up to 20 months.
Methods
Fourteen patients with type 2 or 3 SMA (seven with SMA type 2, six with SMA type 3; age range: 18–51) were included. The Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM) and the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE) were recorded at baseline and at follow-up (month 4, 8, 12, 16, 20). Treatment adverse events were collected at every follow-up visit. Patients’ treatment satisfaction was assessed by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM).
Results
Half of the patients reached the 20-month follow-up. Based on the HFMSE score, no patients had clinically meaningful improvement. Twelve remained stable (92.3%), two showed transient clinically meaningful deterioration (15.4%) and one experienced lasting clinically meaningful deterioration (7.7%). Based on the RULM scores, seven patients were either stable or demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement (53.8%) and six showed clinically meaningful deterioration (46.2%). There was no treatment withdrawal during the follow-up. The most common adverse events were skin rash/increased skin sensitivity to sunlight (n = 3), diarrhea (n = 3), aphthous ulcer (n = 3) and abdominal pain (n = 2). Most patients stated to be at least “satisfied” with the medication.
Conclusions
Risdiplam was well tolerated. Half of the patients remained stable or improved after risdiplam initiation. Larger and multicentric studies are needed to better understand the long-term effects of risdiplam in adult SMA.
Funder
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Nance JR. Spinal muscular atrophy. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2020;26(5):1348–68.
2. Lefebvre S, Burglen L, Reboullet S, Clermont O, Burlet P, Viollet L, et al. Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell. 1995;80(1):155–65.
3. Alias L, Bernal S, Fuentes-Prior P, Barcelo MJ, Also E, Martinez-Hernandez R, et al. Mutation update of spinal muscular atrophy in Spain: molecular characterization of 745 unrelated patients and identification of four novel mutations in the SMN1 gene. Hum Genet. 2009;125(1):29–39.
4. Lunn MR, Wang CH. Spinal muscular atrophy. Lancet. 2008;371(9630):2120–33.
5. Biogen. SPINRAZA (nusinersen) for intrathecal use. December, 2016. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/209531lbl.pdf (Accessed 23 Jan 2023).