Author:
Tchimino Jack,Dideriksen Jakob Lund,Dosen Strahinja
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Closing the control loop in myoelectric prostheses by providing artificial somatosensory feedback is recognized as an important goal. However, designing a feedback interface that is effective in realistic conditions is still a challenge. Namely, in some situations, feedback can be redundant, as the information it provides can be readily obtained through hearing or vision (e.g., grasping force estimated from the deformation of a compliant object). EMG feedback is a non-invasive method wherein the tactile stimulation conveys to the user the level of their own myoelectric signal, hence a measurement intrinsic to the interface, which cannot be accessed incidentally.
Methods
The present study investigated the efficacy of EMG feedback in prosthesis force control when 10 able-bodied participants and a person with transradial amputation used a myoelectric prosthesis to grasp compliant objects of different stiffness values. The performance with feedback was compared to that achieved when the participants relied solely on incidental cues.
Results
The main outcome measures were the task success rate and completion time. EMG feedback resulted in significantly higher success rates regardless of pin stiffness, indicating that the feedback enhanced the accuracy of force application despite the abundance of incidental cues. Contrary to expectations, there was no difference in the completion time between the two feedback conditions. Additionally, the data revealed that the participants could produce smoother control signals when they received EMG feedback as well as more consistent commands across trials, signifying better control of the system by the participants.
Conclusions
The results presented in this study further support the efficacy of EMG feedback when closing the prosthesis control loop by demonstrating its benefits in particularly challenging conditions which maximized the utility of intrinsic feedback sources.
Funder
Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Informatics,Rehabilitation
Reference34 articles.
1. Antfolk C, D’Alonzo M, Rosén B, Lundborg G, Sebelius F, Cipriani C. Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013;10(1):45–54.
2. Pomares G, Coudane H, Dap F, Dautel G. Psychological effects of traumatic upper-limb amputations. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020;106(2):297–300.
3. Shahsavari H, Matourypour P, Ghiyasvandian S, Ghorbani A, Bakhshi F, Mahmoudi M, et al. Upper limb amputation; Care needs for reintegration to life: an integrative review. International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing. Volume 38. Elsevier; 2020. p. 100773.
4. Kristjansdottir F, Dahlin LB, Rosberg H-E, Carlsson IK. Social participation in persons with upper limb amputation receiving an esthetic prosthesis. J Hand Ther. 2020;33(4):520–7.
5. Esquenazi A. Pain management post amputation. In: Monga TN, Grabois M, editors. Pain Management in Rehabilitation. New York, NY: Demos Medical Publishing; 2002. pp. 191–202.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献