Author:
Schaal Patrick,Cheaib Bachar,Kaufmann Joshka,Phillips Karl,Ryder Liz,McGinnity Phil,Llewellyn Martin
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Rapidly spreading parasitic infections like amoebic gill disease (AGD) are increasingly problematic for Atlantic salmon reared in aquaculture facilities and potentially pose a risk to wild fish species in surrounding waters. Currently, it is not known whether susceptibility to AGD differs between wild and farmed salmon. Wild Atlantic salmon populations are declining and this emerging disease could represent an additional threat to their long-term viability. A better understanding of how AGD affects fish health is therefore relevant for the accurate assessment of the associated risk, both to farming and to the well-being of wild populations. In this study, we assessed the impact of natural exposure to AGD on wild, hybrid and farmed post-smolt Atlantic salmon reared in a sea farm together under common garden conditions.
Results
Wild fish showed substantially higher mortality levels (64%) than farmed fish (25%), with intermediate levels for hybrid fish (39%) suggesting that AGD susceptibility has an additive genetic basis. Metabolic rate measures representing physiological performance were similar among the genetic groups but were significantly lower in AGD-symptomatic fish than healthy fish. Gut microbial diversity was significantly lower in infected fish. We observed major shifts in gut microbial community composition in response to AGD infections. In symptomatic fish the relative abundance of key taxa Aliivibrio, Marinomonas and Pseudoalteromonas declined, whereas the abundance of Polaribacter and Vibrio increased compared to healthy fish.
Conclusions
Our results highlight the stress AGD imposes on fish physiology and suggest that low metabolic-rate fish phenotypes may be associated with better infection outcomes. We consider the role increased AGD outbreak events and a warmer future may have in driving secondary bacterial infections and in reducing performance in farmed and wild fish.
Funder
Science Foundation Ireland
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference122 articles.
1. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020: sustainability in action. Rome: FAO; 2020. p. 2020.
2. Naylor RL, Hardy RW, Buschmann AH, Bush SR, Cao L, Klinger DH, et al. A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture. Nature. 2021;591:551–63.
3. Naylor RL, Goldburg RJ, Primavera JH, Kautsky N, Folke C. Effect of aquaculture on world ®sh supplies. Nature. 2000;405:790.
4. Baldwin L. The effects of stocking density on fish welfare. 2011.
5. Ciji A, Akhtar MS. Stress management in aquaculture: a review of dietary interventions. Rev Aquac. 2021;13:2190–247.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献