Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Colombia has 50,912,429 inhabitants, but only 50–70% of the population can effectively access health care services. The emergency room (ER) is a main contributor to the in-hospital care system since up to half of the admissions come through it. Telemedicine has become a tool to facilitate effective access to health care services, improve the timeliness of care, reduce diagnostic variability, and reduce costs associated with health. The aim of this study is to describe the experience of a Distance Emergency Care Program through Telemedicine (TelEmergency) to improve specialist access for patients at the Emergency Room (ER) in low- and medium-level care hospitals in Colombia.
Methods
An observational descriptive study of a cohort including 1,544 patients during the program’s first two years was conducted. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the available data. The data are presented with summarized statistics of sociodemographic, clinical, and patient-care variables.
Results
The study included a total of 1,544 patients, and the majority were adults between 60 and 79 years of age (n = 491, 32%). More than half were men (n = 832, 54%), and 68% (n = 1,057) belonged to the contributory health care regime. The service was requested from 346 municipalities, 70% (n = 1,076) from intermediate and rural settings. The most common diagnoses were related to COVID-19 (n = 356, 22%), respiratory diseases (n = 217, 14%), and cardiovascular diseases (n = 162, 10%). We observed 44% (n = 681) of local admissions either under observation (n = 53, 3%) or hospitalization (n = 380, 24%), limiting the need for hospital transfers.
Program operation data revealed that 50% (n = 799) of requests were answered within two hours by the medical staff. The initial diagnosis was modified in 7% (n = 119) of the patients after being evaluated by specialists at the TelEmergency program.
Conclusions
This study shows the operational data collected during the first two years after the implementation of the TelEmergency program in Colombia, the first of its kind in the country. Its implementation offered specialized timely management of patients at the ER in low- and medium-level care hospitals, where there is no availability of specialized doctors.
Funder
This project was developed with resources from the “Summons for the Systematization of Experiences of the Digital Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antioquia.”
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Salud M de. Análisis de Situación de Salud (ASIS) Colombia, 2020. Bogotá, Colombia: Ministerio de Salud; 2020. Available from: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/VS/ED/PSP/asis-2020-colombia.pdf.
2. Bran Piedrahita L, Valencia Arias A, Palacios Moya L, Gómez Molina S, Acevedo Correa Y, Arias AC. Barreras de acceso del sistema de salud colombiano en zonas rurales: percepciones de usuarios del régimen subsidiado. Hacia Promoc Salud. 2020;25(2):29–38.
3. Ayala-García J. La salud en Colombia : más cobertura pero menos acceso [Internet]. Bogotá, Colombia: Banco de la República; 2014. 1–45. (Documentos de trabajo sobre economía regional). Report No.: 204. Cited 2021 Dec 22. Available from: https://repositorio.banrep.gov.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.12134/3072/dtser_204.pdf.
4. Salud M de. Cifras de aseguramiento en salud. Cifras de aseguramiento en salud. 2021 Cited 2021 Dec 22. Available from: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/proteccionsocial/Paginas/cifras-aseguramiento-salud.aspx.
5. Mendieta González D, Jaramillo CE. El sistema general de seguridad social en salud de Colombia. Universal, pero ineficiente: a propósito de los veinticinco años de su creación. Rev Latinoam Derecho Soc. 2019;1(29):201.