Author:
Häckel Sonja,Hofmann Elena,Anwander Helen,Albers Christoph E.,Basedow Jasmin,Bigdon Sebastian F.,Exadaktylos Aristomenis K.,Keel Marius J. B.,Dunn Robert N.,Maqungo Sithombo,Benneker Lorin M.,Held Michael,Hoppe Sven
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Spinal injuries are present in 16–31% of polytraumatized patients. Rapid identification of spinal injuries requiring immobilization or operative treatment is essential. The Lodox-Statscan (LS) has evolved into a promising time-saving diagnostic tool to diagnose life-threatening injuries with an anterior-posterior (AP)-full-body digital X-ray.
Methods
We aimed to analyze the diagnostic accuracy and the interrater reliability of AP-LS to detect spinal injuries in polytraumatized patients. Therefore, within 3 years, AP-LS of polytraumatized patients (ISS ≥ 16) were retrospectively analyzed by three independent observers. The sensitivity and specificity of correct diagnosis with AP-LS compared to CT scan were calculated. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by using the area under the ROC (receiver operating characteristic curve) for sensitivity and specificity. Interrater reliability between the three observers was calculated using Fleiss’ Kappa. The sensitivity of AP-LS was further analyzed by the severity of spinal injuries.
Results
The study group included 320 patients (48.5 years ±19.5, 89 women). On CT scan, 207 patients presented with a spinal injury (65%, total of 332 injuries). AP-LS had a low sensitivity of 9% (31 of 332, range 0–24%) and high specificity of 99% (range 98–100%). The sensitivity was highest for thoracic spinal injuries (14%). The interrater reliability was slight (κ = 0.02; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.03). Potentially unstable spinal injuries were more likely to be detected than stable injuries (sensitivity 18 and 6%, respectively).
Conclusion
This study demonstrated high specificity with low sensitivity of AP-LS in detecting spinal injuries compared to CT scan. In polytraumatized patients, AP-LS, implemented in the Advanced Trauma Life Support-algorithm, is a helpful tool to diagnose life-threatening injuries. However, if spinal injuries are suspected, performing a full-body CT scan is necessary for correct diagnosis.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Deyle S, Wagner A, Benneker LM, Jeger V, Eggli S, Bonel HM, et al. Could full-body digital X-ray (LODOX-Statscan) screening in trauma challenge conventional radiography? J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2009;66:418–22.
2. Woltmann A. Polytrauma. In: Chirurgie der verletzten Wirbelsäule. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013. p. 407–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02208-1_25.
3. Marshall LF, Knowlton S, Garfin SR, Klauber MR, Eisenberg HM, Kopaniky D, et al. Deterioration following spinal cord injury. A multicenter study. J Neurosurg. 1987;66:400–4.
4. Morris CGT, McCoy É. Clearing the cervical spine in unconscious polytrauma victims, balancing risks and effective screening. Anaesthesia. 2004;59:464–82.
5. Bostock J, Buckley J, Burden D, Camps C, Chiverton N, Gardner B, et al. National Clinical Guideline Centre Spinal injury: assessment and initial management spinal injury assessment: assessment and imaging for spinal injury spinal injury assessment contents. 2015.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献