Author:
Zhang Shao-Yang,Li Chang-Li,Yin Jian,Jiang Meng,Yang Xiao-Feng
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Preliminary evidence demonstrates that visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure (SBP) variability is a prognostic factor of TBI. However, literature regarding the impact of initial blood pressure management on the outcomes of TBI patients is limited. We aimed to further validate the clinical significance of BPV on the prognostic outcomes of patients with TBI.
Methods
We performed the analysis by using individual patient-level data acquired from the eICU-CRD, which collected 200,859 ICU admissions of 139,367 patients in 2014 and 2015 from 208 US hospitals. Adult patients with traumatic intraparenchymal hemorrhage or contusion were included. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcome was discharge-home rate. Blood pressure variability (BPV) was calculated according to standard criteria: at least six measurements were taken in the first 24 h (hyperacute group) and 36 over days 2–7 (acute group). We estimated the associations between BPV and outcomes with logistic and proportional odds regression models. The key parameter for BPV was standard deviation (SD) of SBP, categorized into quintiles. We also calculated the average real variability (ARV), as well as maximum, minimum, and mean SBP for comparison in our analysis.
Results
We studied 1486 patients in the hyperacute group and 857 in the acute group. SD of SBP had a significant association with the in-hospital mortality for both the hyperacute group (highest quintile adjusted OR 2.28 95% CI 1.18–4.42; ptrend<0.001) and the acute group (highest quintile adjusted OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.08–4.36; ptrend<0.001). The strongest predictors of primary outcome were SD of SBP in the hyperacute phase and minimum SBP in the acute phase. Associations were similar for the discharge-home rate (for the hyperacute group, highest quintile adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37–0.89; ptrend<0.001; for the acute group OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32–0.95; ptrend<0.001).
Conclusion
Systolic BPV seems to predict a poor outcome in patients with TBI. The benefits of early treatment to maintain appropriate SBP level might be enhanced by smooth and sustained control.
Funder
Zhejiang University “Hundred Talents Program”
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Svedung WT, Howells T, Lewén A, Enblad P. Blood pressure variability and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure-new therapeutic targets in traumatic brain Injury. Neurosurgery. 2020;86:E300–9.
2. Orito K, Hirohata M, Nakamura Y, Yamamoto M, Takeshige N, Aoki T, et al. Predictive value of Leakage signs for pure brain Contusional Hematoma Expansion. J Neurotraum. 2018;35:760–6.
3. Galgano M, Toshkezi G, Qiu X, Russell T, Chin L, Zhao LR. Traumatic Brain Injury: current treatment strategies and future endeavors. Cell Transpl. 2017;26:1118–30.
4. Colantonio A, Escobar MD, Chipman M, McLellan B, Austin PC, Mirabella G, et al. Predictors of postacute mortality following traumatic brain injury in a seriously injured population. J Trauma. 2008;64:876–82.
5. Peck KA, Calvo RY, Sise CB, Johnson J, Yen JW, Sise MJ, et al. Death after discharge: predictors of mortality in older brain-injured patients. J Trauma Acute Care. 2014;77:978–83.