Author:
Mboya Erick A.,Ndumwa Harrieth P.,Amani Davis E.,Nkondora Paulina N.,Mlele Victoria,Biyengo Happines,Mashoka Ramadhan,Haniffa Rashan,Beane Abi,Mfinanga Juma,Sunguya Bruno F.,Sawe Hendry R.,Baker Tim
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Critically ill patients have life-threatening conditions requiring immediate vital organ function intervention. But, critical illness in the emergency department (ED) has not been comprehensively described in resource-limited settings. Understanding the characteristics and dynamics of critical illness can help hospitals prepare for and ensure the continuum of care for critically ill patients. This study aimed to describe the pattern and outcomes of critically ill patients at the ED of the National Hospital in Tanzania from 2019 to 2021.
Methodology
This hospital-records-based retrospective cohort study analyzed records of all patients who attended the ED of Muhimbili National Hospital between January 2019 and December 2021. Data extracted from the ED electronic database included clinical and demographic information, diagnoses, and outcome status at the ED. Critical illness in this study was defined as either a severe derangement of one or more vital signs measured at triage or the provision of critical care intervention. Data were analyzed using Stata 17 to examine critical illnesses’ burden, characteristics, first-listed diagnosis, and outcomes at the ED.
Results
Among the 158,445 patients who visited the ED in the study period, 16,893 (10.7%) were critically ill. The burden of critical illness was 6,346 (10.3%) in 2019, 5,148 (10.9%) in 2020, and 5,400 (11.0%) in 2021. Respiratory (18.8%), cardiovascular (12.6%), infectious diseases (10.2%), and trauma (10.2%) were the leading causes of critical illness. Most (81.6%) of the critically ill patients presenting at the ED were admitted or transferred, of which 11% were admitted to the ICUs and 89% to general wards. Of the critically ill, 4.8% died at the ED.
Conclusion
More than one in ten patients attending the Tanzanian National Hospital emergency department was critically ill. The number of critically ill patients did not increase during the pandemic. The majority were admitted to general hospital wards, and about one in twenty died at the ED. This study highlights the burden of critical illness faced by hospitals and the need to ensure the availability and quality of emergency and critical care throughout hospitals.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Baker T. Critical care in Low Resources Settings. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet; 2015. p. 68.
2. Kayambankadzanja RK, Schell CO, Wärnberg MG, Tamras T, Mollazadegan H. Towards definitions of critical illness and critical care using concept analysis. BMJ Open. 2022;12(e060972):1–11.
3. Adhikari NKJ, Fowler RA, Bhagwanjee S, Rubenfeld GD. Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults. Lancet. 2010;376(9749):1339–46.
4. Baker T, Schultz MJ, Dünser MW. Critical illness in developing countries: Dying in the dark. Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1405. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60572-2.
5. Vincent J, Marshall JC, Ñamendys-silva SA, François B, Martin-loeches I, Lipman J et al. Assessment of the worldwide burden of critical illness: the Intensive Care Over Nations (ICON) audit. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(May).