Author:
Gardiner Galina,Eli Karin,Huxley Caroline J.,Fothergill Rachael,Perkins Gavin D.,Smyth Michael A.,Griffiths Frances,Slowther Anne-Marie
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Paramedics are responsible for critical resuscitation decisions when attending Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrests (OHCA). Existing research indicates that a range of clinical and non-clinical factors moderate their decision-making. Within the United Kingdom (UK), there is little evidence on how and why paramedics make their decisions at actual OHCA events.
Methods
We explored the experiences of UK paramedics using individually recalled OHCA events as catalysts for discussion. Pen portraits developed from semi-structured interviews with 31 paramedics across two UK ambulance services were thematically analysed, enabling cross-participant comparisons whilst retaining depth and context.
Results
We identified four themes: uncertainties encountered in resuscitation guidelines, influences on decision-making, holistic perspectives, and indirect moderators. We found that paramedics experienced uncertainty at all stages of the resuscitation process. Uncertainties arose from indeterminate, ambiguous or complex information and were described as having both clinical and ethical dimensions. Whilst guidelines drove paramedics’ decisions, non-clinical personal, practical and relational factors moderated their assessments of survivability and decision-making, with attitudes to interactions between patient age, frailty and quality of life playing a substantial role. Coping strategies such as uncertainty reduction, assumption-based reasoning and weighing pros and cons were evident from interviews.
Conclusions
The complexity of interactions between clinical and non-clinical factors points to an element of variability in paramedics’ responses to uncertainty. Exploring UK paramedics’ uncertainties and decision-making during specific OHCA events can help acknowledge and address uncertainties in resuscitation guidelines and paramedic training, providing paramedics with the tools to manage uncertainty in a consistent and transparent way.
Funder
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference34 articles.
1. OHCAO Epidemiological Report. Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Overview: English Ambulance Services 2022. 2022. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/med/research/ctu/trials/ohcao/publications/epidemiologyreports/ohcao_epidemiological_report_2022_england_overview_final_07.12.2023.pdf.
2. Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee. JRCALC Clinical guidelines 2022. Class Professional Publishing; 2022.
3. National Health Service England. NHS England Ambulance Quality Indicators: Clinical Outcomes 2023 Available from: https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.england.nhs.uk%2Fstatistics%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fsites%2F2%2F2023%2F12%2FAmbCO-time-series-to-20230731.xlsx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK
4. Anderson NE, Gott M, Slark J. Commence, continue, withhold or terminate? A systematic review of decision-making in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Eur J Emerg Med. 2017;24(2):80–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000407.
5. Brandling J, Kirby K, Black S, Voss S, Benger J. Emergency medical service provider decision-making in out of hospital cardiac arrest: an exploratory study. BMC Emerg Med. 2017;17:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-017-0136-3.