Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Increasing numbers of ambulance calls, vacant positions and growing workloads in Emergency Medicine (EM) are increasing the pressure to find adequate solutions. With telemedicine providing health-care services by bridging large distances, connecting remote providers and even patients while using modern communication technologies, such a technology seems beneficial. As the process of developing an optimal solution is challenging, a need to quantify involved processes could improve implementation. Existing models are based on qualitative studies although standardised questionnaires for factors such as Usability, Acceptability and Effectiveness exist.
Methods
A survey was provided to participants within a German county. It was based on telemedical surveys, the System Usabilty Scale (SUS) and earlier works describing Usability, Acceptability and Effectiveness. Meanwhile a telemedical system was introduced in the investigated county. A comparison between user-groups aswell as an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed.
Results
Of n = 91 included participants n = 73 (80,2%) were qualified as emergency medical staff (including paramedics n = 36 (39,56%), EMTs n = 28 (30,77%), call handlers n = 9 (9,89%)) and n = 18 (19,8%) as emergency physicians. Most participants approved that telemedicine positively impacts EM and improved treatment options with an overall Usabilty Score of 68,68. EFA provided a 3-factor solution involving Usability, Acceptability and Effectiveness.
Discussion
With our results being comparable to earlier studies but telemedicine only having being sparsely introduced, a positive attitude could still be attested. While our model describes 51,28% of the underlying factors, more research is needed to identify further influences. We showed that Usability is correlated with Acceptability (strong effect), Usability and Effectiveness with a medium effect, likewise Acceptability and Effectiveness. Therefore available systems need to improve. Our approach can be a guide for decision makers and developers, that a focus during implementation must be on improving usability and on a valid data driven implementation process.
Funder
Technische Hochschule Mittelhessen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference47 articles.
1. Andrew E, Nehme Z, Cameron P, Smith K. Drivers of increasing emergency ambulance demand. Prehosp Emerg Care 3 Mai. 2020;24(3):385–93.
2. Aringhieri R, Bruni ME, Khodaparasti S, van Essen JT. Emergency medical services and beyond: addressing new challenges through a wide literature review. Computers Oper Res 1 Februar. 2017;78:349–68.
3. Di Somma S, Paladino L, Vaughan L, Lalle I, Magrini L, Magnanti M. März. Overcrowding in emergency department: an international issue. Intern Emerg Med. 1. 2015;10(2):171–5.
4. Andrew E, Nehme Z, Stephenson M, Walker T, Smith K. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on demand for emergency ambulances in Victoria, Australia. Prehospital Emerg Care 2 Januar. 2022;26(1):23–9.
5. Kim DK, Kim TH, Shin SD, Ro YS, Song KJ, Hong KJ. u. a. impact of crowding in local ambulance demand on call-to-ambulance scene arrival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Am J Emerg Med Februar. 2022;52:105–9.