Author:
Bartels Susan A.,MacKenzie Meredith,Douglas Stuart L.,Collier Amanda,Pritchard Jodie,Purkey Eva,Messenger David,Walker Melanie
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Emergency departments (EDs) serve an integral role in healthcare, particularly for vulnerable populations. However, marginalized groups often report negative ED experiences, including stigmatizing attitudes and behaviours. We engaged with historically marginalized patients to better understand their ED care experiences.
Method
Participants were invited to complete an anonymous mixed-methods survey about a previous ED experience. We analysed quantitative data including controls and equity-deserving groups (EDGs) - those who self-identified as: (a) Indigenous; (b) having a disability; (c) experiencing mental health issues; (d) a person who uses substances; (e) a sexual and gender minority; (f) a visible minority; (g) experiencing violence; and/or (h) facing homelessness - to identify differences in their perspectives. Differences between EDGs and controls were calculated with chi squared tests, geometric means with confidence ellipses, and the Kruskal-Wallis H test.
Results
We collected a total of 2114 surveys from 1973 unique participants, 949 controls and 994 who identified as equity-deserving. Members of EDGs were more likely to attribute negative feelings to their ED experience (p < 0.001), to indicate that their identity impacted the care received (p < 0.001), and that they felt disrespected and/or judged while in the ED (p < 0.001). Members of EDGs were also more likely to indicate that they had little control over healthcare decisions (p < 0.001) and that it was more important to be treated with kindness/respect than to receive the best possible care (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Members of EDGs were more likely to report negative ED care experiences. Equity-deserving individuals felt judged and disrespected by ED staff and felt disempowered to make decisions about their care. Next steps will include contextualizing findings using participants’ qualitative data and identifying how to improve ED care experiences among EDGs to make it more inclusive and better able to meet their healthcare needs.
Funder
Queen’s University Catalyst Fund
Clinical Teachers’ Association of Queen’s University
Queen’s University Fund for Scholarly Research and Creative Work and Professional Development
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Canada Council for the Arts. Equity-seeking groups [cited 2021 December 7]. Available from: https://canadacouncil.ca/glossary/equity-seeking-groups. Accessed: September 29 2022
2. Ionescu-Ittu R, McCuskter J, Ciampi A, Vadeboncoeur A-M, Roberge D, Larouche D et al. Continuity of primary care and emergency department utilization among elderly people. 2007:1362–8.
3. Malone RE. Whither the Almshouse? Overutilization and the role of the Emergency Department. J Health Politics. 1998;23(5):795–832.
4. Richardson LD, Hwang U. Access to care a review of the Emergency Medicine Literature. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8(11):1030–6.
5. Ragin DF, Hwang U, Cydulka RK, Holson D, Haley LL, Richards CF, et al. Reasons for using the Emergency Department: results of the EMPATH Study. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12(12):1158–66.