Author:
Wallstab Florian,Greiner Felix,Schirrmeister Wiebke,Wehrle Markus,Walcher Felix,Wrede Christian,Habbinga Kirsten,Behringer Wilhelm,Brammen Dominik
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Compelling data on clinical emergency medicine is required for healthcare system management.
The aim of this survey was to describe the nationwide status quo of emergency care in Germany at the healthcare system level using the Utstein reporting template as the guideline to measure the data collected.
Methods
This cross-sectional survey collected standardized data from German EDs in 2018. All 759 of the EDs listed in a previously collected ED Directory were contacted in November 2019 using the online-survey tool SoSci Survey.
Exclusively descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Absolute as well as relative frequencies, medians, means, ranges, standard deviations (SD) and interquartile ranges (IQR) were reported depending on distribution.
Main Results
A total of 150 questionnaires of contacted EDs were evaluated (response rate: 19.8%). Hospitals had a median of 403 inpatient beds (n=147). The EDs recorded a median of 30,000 patient contacts (n=136). Eighty-three EDs (55%) had observation units with a median of six beds. The special patient groups were pediatric patients (< 5 years) and older patients (> 75 years) with a median of 1.7% and 25%, respectively. Outpatients accounted for 55%, while 45% were admitted (intensive care unit 5.0%, standard care unit 32.3%, observation unit 6.3%) and 1.2% transferred to another hospital.
Conclusions
The use of the Utstein reporting template enabled the collection of ED descriptive parameters in Germany. The data can provide a baseline for upcoming reforms on German emergency medicine, and for international comparisons on admission rates, initial triage categories, and patient populations.
Funder
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Canadian Institute for Health Information. NACRS Emergency Department (ED) Visits: Volumes and Median Length of Stay by Triage Level, Visit Disposition, and Main Problem. https://www.cihi.ca/en/nacrs-emergency-department-ed-visits-volumes-and-median-length-of-stay-by-triage-level-visit (accessed 9 Apr 2021).
2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s hospitals at a glance 2018-19. Cat. no. H. Canberra. 2020, 2020. https://doi.org/10.25816/eb1n-rn89 .
3. Rui P, Kang K. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2017 Emergency Department Summary Tables. Natl Cent Heal Stat. 2017; https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhamcs/web_tables/2017_ed_web_tables-508.pdf. (accessed 9 Apr 2021).
4. Schöpke T, Dodt C, Brachmann M, Schnieder W, Petersen PF, Böer J. Statusbericht aus deutschen Notaufnahmen: Ergebnisse der DGINA-Mitgliederbefragung 2013. Notf Rett Med. 2014;17:660–70.
5. Wrede C, Somasundaram R. Entwicklung der innerklinischen Notfallmedizin in Deutschland. Notfall und Rettungsmedizin. 2017;20:570–3.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献