Author:
Mellum Marlene,Saei Raika,Brattebø Guttorm,Wisborg Torben
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Recent research has indicated that sex is an important determinant of emergency medical response in patients with possible serious injuries. Men were found to receive more advanced prehospital treatment and more helicopter transportation and trauma centre destinations and were more often received by an activated trauma team, even when adjusted for injury mechanism.
Emergency medical dispatchers choose initial resources when serious injury is suspected after a call to the emergency medical communication centre. This study aimed to assess how dispatchers evaluate primary responses in trauma victims, with a special focus on the sex of the victim.
Methods
Emergency medical dispatchers were interviewed using focus groups and a semistructured interview guide developed specifically for this study. Two vignettes describing typical and realistic injury scenarios were discussed. Verbatim transcripts of the conversations were analysed via systematic text condensation. The findings were reported in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies (COREQ) checklist.
Results
The analysis resulted in the main category “Tailoring the right response to the patient”, supported by three categories “Get an overview of location and scene safety”, “Patient condition” and “Injury mechanism and special concerns”. The informants consistently maintained that sex was not a relevant variable when deciding emergency medical response during dispatch and claimed that they rarely knew the sex of the patient before a response was implemented. Some of the participants also raised the question of whether the Norwegian trauma criteria reliably detect serious injury in women.
Conclusions
The results indicate that the emergency medical response is largely based on the national trauma criteria and that sex is of little or no importance during dispatch. The observed sex differences in the emergency medical response seems to be caused by other factors during the emergency medical response phase.
Funder
Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Emergency Medical Communication
University of Tromsø – The Arctic University of Norway
UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference16 articles.
1. Wahlin RR, Ponzer S, Lövbrand H, Skrivfars M, Lossius HM, Castrén M. Do male and female trauma patients receive the same prehospital care?: an observational follow-up study. BMC Emerg Med. 2016;16:6.
2. Gomez D, Haas B, de Mestral C, Sharma S, Hsiao M, Zagorski B, Rubenfeld G, Ray J, Nathens AB. Gender-associated differences in access to trauma center care: A population-based analysis. Surgery. 2012;152(2):179–85.
3. Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Trauma. Identifikasjon av alvorlig skade; 2024 [In Norwegian cited 15 March 2024]. Versjon 3:[Available from: https://traumeplan.no/index.php?action=showtopic&topic=7KWeaS85. Accessed 15 Mar 2024.
4. Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Trauma. Akuttsykehus med traumefunksjon; 2020 [In Norwegian cited 15 Januar 2023]. Versjon 1.1:[Available from: https://traumeplan.no/index.php?action=showtopic&topic=AcDuJWfS. Accessed 15 Mar 2024.
5. Sturms LM, Driessen MLS, van Klaveren D, Ten Duis HJ, Kommer GJ, Bloemers FW, den Hartog D, Edwards MJ, Leenhouts PA, van Zutphen S, Schipper IB, Spanjersberg R, Wendt KW, de Wit RJ, Poeze M, Leenen LP, de Jongh M. Dutch trauma system performance: Are injured patients treated at the right place? Injury. 2021;52(7):1688–96.