Abstract
AbstractThis paper investigates the circumstances under which a central bank is more or less likely to deviate from the optimal monetary policy rule. The research question is addressed in a simple New Keynesian dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model in which monetary policy deviations occur endogenously. The model solution suggests that higher future central bank credibility attenuates the current period policy trade-off between a stable inflation rate and a stable output gap. Together with the loss of credibility after a policy deviation, this provides the central bank with an incentive to implement past policy commitments. The result is valid even if the central bank may recover credibility with some probability after a policy deviation. My main finding is that the central bank is willing to implement past policy commitments if a sufficient fraction of agents is not aware of the exact end date of the policy commitment. The result challenges the time-inconsistency argument against monetary policy commitments and provides a potential explanation for the repeated implementation of monetary policy commitments in reality.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Statistics and Probability
Reference16 articles.
1. Andrade, P., Gaballo, G., Mengus, E., Mojon, B. (2019). Forward guidance and heterogeneous beliefs. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 11(3), 1–29.
2. Angeletos, G.-M., & Lian, C. (2018). Forward guidance without common knowledge. American Economic Review, 108(9), 2477–2512.
3. Barro, R.J., & Gordon, D.B. (1983). A positive theory of monetary policy in a natural rate model. Journal of Political Economy, 91(4), 589–610.
4. Barro, R.J., & Gordon, D.B. (1983). Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 12(1), 101–121.
5. Bodenstein, M., Hebden, J., Nunes, R. (2012). Imperfect credibility and the zero lower bound. Journal of Monetary Economics, 59(2), 135–149.